Dev Tracker

I think what works best is when theme week topics can have multiple interpretations and meanings.

For example, "Monster Hunters" could have been a reference to the video game or just a reference to the new hunter's apparel that was released. "Birds of Prey" was a reference to the Superbowl, but it also could simply be about real predatory birds.

Theme Week Update for those that don't want to go searching for it.

i'm not saying it absolutely isn't coming soon, but just before we all hype too much, i want to point out that aequorin has stated that roundsey & theme weeks will not be used to drop hints about upcoming updates

Erm looks like the bug thread link leads to the Eclipse Gene Error thread?

The AH functions are good in some ways, but in others they disgust me. I don't understand why the features I'm about to propose don't exist.


There should be a way to view past listings; some kind of button you'd press to view only completed, expired, or both listings. There should also be a function to view the ones in the past day, week, two weeks, month, or all time. This would allow people to find an average price for items with no or close to no listings.
The bestiary: it stinks. There is no easy way to search only search fams that you haven't discovered yet, or even ones you already discovered. If this were to be a thing, you should also be able to search by user, so you could find out the undiscovered fams and their prices for other people.
When you click 'Sort by', you should be able to select a feature to search only for the lowest price for the item, and then it will show the lowest for the next item, etc. This will shorten the search time by a lot, as you are only viewing one listing per item.

Let me know what you think!






This thread has been sanitised, it is safe for licking.

I have to verify my account with a number in order to chat? ;o; I didn't have to do that last time? I'm confused. :c

[...] I noticed that the 'new' text does not appear if you are adding a familiar from your hoard [...]

(Thank you kindly for letting me know and taking the time to answer my question, I appreciate it! I hope that your next stream goes well and that it's a ton of fun for everyone! :D Take care! ^^

EDIT: No need to read any of this (no need to reply either, I don't mean to pretentiously demand your time or anything, ah!!), but -

I forgot to mention that it's totally valid that a video would take a long time to process or edit - they're very large files and would take a lot of extra energy to parse through. I've done a bit of this enough to know just how monumental and time-consuming a task it can be, so it's really understandable to me that they're not really much of a priority in light of other things and whatnot! You probably already know this, and I don't mean to be patronizing if you do, but HandBrake is an excellent tool for compressing video sizes by the way, to make them easier to upload though, so that the resulting file isn't as ginormous as it could be. In my experience, it has a tendency to cut down on file size by half sometimes, which can make a world of difference! But uhm... you probably already knew this, so don't mind me rambling, and even with HandBrake it still doesn't change the fact that actually processing the internal parts of the video still takes much effort and time so! I hope you have a good day regardless!

EDIT 2: Oh and I've had experience adding captions to videos by hand and it takes an enormous amount of time too, so. Definitely a very, very long endeavor and whatnot. Anyways aha I'm rambling, I just mean to say that I 100% understand that it would take a bit to process anything like that!!)

after today's update, i decided to test again: diffused dither now renders in waterfox 2022.

i'm not sure if anything meaningful changed backend between my last post and this. maybe it was a cache issue.

• We have rebalanced how semitransparent pixels are handled in the following effects: Sixteen Bit, Dot Matrix Downgrade, Cathode. Pixels with less than 50% opacity will be ignored. This restricts fewer than the old 90% opacity threshold.