@
Wintrymix
Wintrymix wrote on 2017-04-17:
@ LordAlois I'll get to your post in a minute but in the meantime.
1. I'm not the one getting onto anyone for fluff-posting, and that's not my reasoning for being suspicious of Red.
2. My fluff posting is enjoyable to others and usually very minor, usually happens after lock-down or after I've said something productive and in general happens only in games where I know a majority, if not all of the player list.
3. As I've mentioned before, I don't play ~in the past~. I play the current game at hand and digging up stuff from other games to use against me is a misleading and a petty attempt to make a case against me. Play styles change and I'm rather adaptive.
@
Wintrymix
1. "a majority of what they've posted has not contributed" Non-contributing posts are fluffing, correct? Then you were making that a part of your case against Red.
2. As you can see, others in the past have reacted joyfully and were pretty minor in terms of how much posting. So for him to expect such backlash...
I know you say usually, but in that specific game it was your first post. Someone else doing the same shouldn't be an immediate red flag to you, as that happens in the beginning.
I know almost everyone - or at least have seen - in this mafia game. The only people are SilverNight104 and Foxmeow. Since Red and I play in most games together, he is most likely the same.
3. Misleading and petty? Not really - it shows what you've done in the past, and this isn't a year ago, it was around a month ago. How I've played in other games is at least semi-important to this game as it shows how I've generally played - it shouldn't mean I have to stick to my meta, but it's worth noting if it suddenly changes for better or for worse.
All said and done, I don't think you're suspicious. I don't think you're mafia. In fact, I'm pretty sure you're town.
@
Valgami
Valgami wrote on 2017-04-17:
@ LordAlois
When did I say that you're a show off
I quoted where you said that, but more specifically
here. (if you look up 'show off' in this thread, you'll find it too btw)
LordAlois wrote on 2017-04-17:
@ Valgami
Valgami wrote on 2017-04-17:
I do think that Wintrymix is a good player, but this does not necessarily mean that I will be impressed if he's trying to be a show off because he pulled off something 'amazing' in a mafia game.
Are you saying I'm trying to be a show off?
Valgami wrote on 2017-04-17:
Second.
I posted a wall in which I explained why it is important to read properly what others are saying. That wording is important. Never did I say or implied that I see you as a show-off. I did not even mentioned you in that few sentences, I gave an example to make my statements more clear.
And yet you're picking out that one part, which itself is already a bit surprising to me (because seriously, what I wrote did got quite long and this is only a small example for something that I personally see as much more important.)
I read and understood your post.
You mentioned me in the sentence after that one.
I simply interpreted it that way, as it seemed like a comparsion to the situation (me being praised for something 'amazing' in a mafia game vs your situation wintrymix being praised for something 'amazing' in a mafia game). That's why I asked you without accusing - I was simply confused as it didn't seem right.
Valgami wrote on 2017-04-17:
...Namely twisting other people's words/trying to imply things that were never stated, nor even thought, in the first place?
Seriously?
I didn't twist your words or try to imply things - I was confused if you were implying anything, which is why I asked, I didn't accuse. I don't understand why you seem ****** off at me for getting confused with what you said - it's been happening a lot in this thread.