Please check the known issues and working-as-intended sections before making a report!
This thread is to track any gene errors that have occurred for
modern dragons in releases that are more than 45 days old. Fixes for these issues will be done as time/bandwidth allow[/u].
In this thread, players may report any errors they encounter with older modern genes. This thread is for technical errors only.[/url] We do not accept consistency error reports on genes that are more than 45 days old.
We define technical errors as things such as: pattern bleed, pixellation, halo effects, inconsistencies within the same breed, color swatch errors, genes being uploaded in place of other genes, misaligned templates, missing artwork, gaps, missing pixels along a seam, missing line art, stray pixels, patterns that bleed outside the silouette, etc.
We define consistency/style differences as differences between an existing gene and its counterparts on other breeds that may differ. Sometimes this is intentional, sometimes it's an oversight.
Please report any technical errors you encounter. We intend to fix all technical errors, though this thread is not considered a priority thread. These fixes will be implemented as time and team availability allow.
Note that it may take a short while for the site's internal image cache to reflect the corrected image assets.
Corrected Issues
Known Issues
- Iridescent and Shimmer with Black Linework - The original 67 colors on site for iridescent were colored by hand without using a tint across the line work on some breeds. This is not intended. For an example check out fae dragons with an original color, particularly a light one where the black shows up. (sky iridescent/sky shimmer is a good example on faes of the black line issue)
- Iridescent and Shimmer with Blown out Highlights - The blown out highlights are present on several species when the recolor update was out. They will often blow out to white, rather than a tint of the color and/or have extreme edges. For an example, check out pearlcatcher dragons with fuschia iridescent/fuschia shimmer.
Investigating (Not sure if issue or not)
Working as intended
- Multi-Gaze & Line-Breaking Tertiaries: Sadly, the multi gaze and line breaking tertiary issue is a technical limitation. Eyes must always layer over the primary, secondary, and tertiary genes, and they are not contextually aware of what is below them and able to alter their shape to accommodate. This is a limitation with all of our dragons that have line breaking tertiaries. In moderns, this includes things like firefly, gembond, spines.
- Iridescent and Shimmer will never be 100% consistent from breed to breed - This gene was unable to be converted to our recolor engine and still has to be colored, hue shifted, and have the opacity and intensity of the highlights done by hand. While So some green dragons may shift from yellow to green to blue, while others may shift from orange to yellow to green. This is not considered an error. What we are interested in correcting is clear errors and inconsistencies within the gene. We consider that errors to be black linework and overblown highlights. The former is objective. The latter is subjective and we will be working on the most egregious offenders. Some highlights that are intense, but not what we consider "blown out" may remain unchanged.
I will be deleting reports that are not relevant to the modern genes that have been out for more than 45 days, reports that have been corrected, reports are not considered an issue, duplicate reports, and discussion or chatter as I encounter/investigate them to keep the thread current with gene reports only.
Please check the known issues and working-as-intended sections before making a report!
This thread is to track any gene errors that have occurred for
modern dragons in releases that are more than 45 days old. Fixes for these issues will be done as time/bandwidth allow[/u].
In this thread, players may report any errors they encounter with older modern genes. This thread is for technical errors only.[/url] We do not accept consistency error reports on genes that are more than 45 days old.
We define technical errors as things such as: pattern bleed, pixellation, halo effects, inconsistencies within the same breed, color swatch errors, genes being uploaded in place of other genes, misaligned templates, missing artwork, gaps, missing pixels along a seam, missing line art, stray pixels, patterns that bleed outside the silouette, etc.
We define consistency/style differences as differences between an existing gene and its counterparts on other breeds that may differ. Sometimes this is intentional, sometimes it's an oversight.
Please report any technical errors you encounter. We intend to fix all technical errors, though this thread is not considered a priority thread. These fixes will be implemented as time and team availability allow.
Note that it may take a short while for the site's internal image cache to reflect the corrected image assets.
Corrected Issues
Known Issues
- Iridescent and Shimmer with Black Linework - The original 67 colors on site for iridescent were colored by hand without using a tint across the line work on some breeds. This is not intended. For an example check out fae dragons with an original color, particularly a light one where the black shows up. (sky iridescent/sky shimmer is a good example on faes of the black line issue)
- Iridescent and Shimmer with Blown out Highlights - The blown out highlights are present on several species when the recolor update was out. They will often blow out to white, rather than a tint of the color and/or have extreme edges. For an example, check out pearlcatcher dragons with fuschia iridescent/fuschia shimmer.
Investigating (Not sure if issue or not)
Working as intended
- Multi-Gaze & Line-Breaking Tertiaries: Sadly, the multi gaze and line breaking tertiary issue is a technical limitation. Eyes must always layer over the primary, secondary, and tertiary genes, and they are not contextually aware of what is below them and able to alter their shape to accommodate. This is a limitation with all of our dragons that have line breaking tertiaries. In moderns, this includes things like firefly, gembond, spines.
- Iridescent and Shimmer will never be 100% consistent from breed to breed - This gene was unable to be converted to our recolor engine and still has to be colored, hue shifted, and have the opacity and intensity of the highlights done by hand. While So some green dragons may shift from yellow to green to blue, while others may shift from orange to yellow to green. This is not considered an error. What we are interested in correcting is clear errors and inconsistencies within the gene. We consider that errors to be black linework and overblown highlights. The former is objective. The latter is subjective and we will be working on the most egregious offenders. Some highlights that are intense, but not what we consider "blown out" may remain unchanged.
I will be deleting reports that are not relevant to the modern genes that have been out for more than 45 days, reports that have been corrected, reports are not considered an issue, duplicate reports, and discussion or chatter as I encounter/investigate them to keep the thread current with gene reports only.
Poison on Snapper F has a small section of "erased" pixels between their nostrils.
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=8&bodygene=11&breed=9&element=6&eyetype=12&gender=1&tert=68&tertgene=0&winggene=0&wings=2&auth=480633b4de7a6378b7036dca62db2319757c0008&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=76&bodygene=11&breed=9&element=6&eyetype=12&gender=1&tert=68&tertgene=0&winggene=0&wings=2&auth=67b3128551a0aa99af23a110946ad87748deadaa&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
This does not appear to be an intentional marking and looks to be an accidental erase mark on the layer of the snout marking, allowing the base head color to show through.
Poison on Snapper F has a small section of "erased" pixels between their nostrils.
This does not appear to be an intentional marking and looks to be an accidental erase mark on the layer of the snout marking, allowing the base head color to show through.
on mobile and unable to fully point them out, but m spiral smirch has a LOT of bleed on the wings.
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=2&bodygene=0&breed=7&element=1&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=86&tertgene=19&winggene=0&wings=2&auth=0b4ef45e028fd1331a3e52393bd243e56c2cd195&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
currently spotted on both the arm wings (lowest two on the art) as well as one of the body wings (highest wing on the art). if anyone would like to properly highlight these, I’d appreciate the help!
on mobile and unable to fully point them out, but m spiral smirch has a LOT of bleed on the wings.
currently spotted on both the arm wings (lowest two on the art) as well as one of the body wings (highest wing on the art). if anyone would like to properly highlight these, I’d appreciate the help!
[quote name="Garlond" date="2024-03-06 19:54:10" ]
on mobile and unable to fully point them out, but m spiral smirch has a LOT of bleed on the wings.
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=2&bodygene=0&breed=7&element=1&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=86&tertgene=19&winggene=0&wings=2&auth=0b4ef45e028fd1331a3e52393bd243e56c2cd195&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
currently spotted on both the arm wings (lowest two on the art) as well as one of the body wings (highest wing on the art). if anyone would like to properly highlight these, I’d appreciate the help!
[/quote]
[center][img]https://i.imgur.com/VJgkzb1.png[/img]
Highlighting the smirch spots. :)[/center]
Garlond wrote on 2024-03-06 19:54:10:
on mobile and unable to fully point them out, but m spiral smirch has a LOT of bleed on the wings.
currently spotted on both the arm wings (lowest two on the art) as well as one of the body wings (highest wing on the art). if anyone would like to properly highlight these, I’d appreciate the help!
Highlighting the smirch spots. :)
Meow
In addition to smirch on spiral males I would like to point out that the bleed on the lowest wing appears slightly on the line art above it which is very easy to miss
[img]https://imgur.com/X4PZymA.png[/img]
In addition to smirch on spiral males I would like to point out that the bleed on the lowest wing appears slightly on the line art above it which is very easy to miss
─────────────────
- +21 FRT
- If you must shorten my name, please refer to me as Classic!
─────────────────
|
|
Black clown on tundras f, m, and hatchling are missing the facial markings (eyeshadow and tear streaks) that are present on all other clown tundra colors
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=9&bodygene=3&breed=6&element=2&eyetype=1&gender=1&tert=131&tertgene=0&winggene=6&wings=9&auth=bfc6c8d6b336b97c81ffce65ba69021e3a76ed3e&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=9&bodygene=3&breed=6&element=2&eyetype=1&gender=0&tert=131&tertgene=0&winggene=6&wings=9&auth=36fe3efb8f9d05dc53be44f53e05ddb884d63ffa&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=0&body=9&bodygene=3&breed=6&element=2&eyetype=1&gender=0&tert=131&tertgene=0&winggene=6&wings=9&auth=e573ac7a8ba3872df3d704bb734a9e390d104cf7&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[center]Male Wildclaw Underbelly has missing coverage
This line that is present along the belly when you put seemingly any color of underbelly on a Primary: Black Basic, male Wildclaw:
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=9&bodygene=0&breed=10&element=2&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=9&tertgene=5&winggene=0&wings=9&auth=11f0a893908a1b19583a2feb6e35c98dc87a5822&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
Black Basic / Black Basic / Black Underbelly
this occurs with other colors, as well. It's just most noticeable on Black basic, since it has such a light belly accent that the few missing pixel coverage of Underbelly really sticks out.
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=9&bodygene=0&breed=10&element=5&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=96&tertgene=5&winggene=0&wings=9&auth=94c8d58ddf91664ab7e2d6aa5ac4a5b645fba8b9&dummyext=prev.png[/img][img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=9&bodygene=0&breed=10&element=5&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=142&tertgene=5&winggene=0&wings=9&auth=d46c47c23045656fa456c2b6aad5c9e1add6e5d1&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
I checked the Gene Error Thread, and it didn't seem like this has been submitted before. Apologies if it has.
Male Wildclaw Underbelly has missing coverage
This line that is present along the belly when you put seemingly any color of underbelly on a Primary: Black Basic, male Wildclaw:
Black Basic / Black Basic / Black Underbelly
this occurs with other colors, as well. It's just most noticeable on Black basic, since it has such a light belly accent that the few missing pixel coverage of Underbelly really sticks out.
I checked the Gene Error Thread, and it didn't seem like this has been submitted before. Apologies if it has.
an older issue i have noted before that doesn't seem to have gotten fixed: tangerine iridescent on coatl hatchlings is missing its proper shading and highlights.
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=0&body=49&bodygene=1&breed=12&element=2&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=128&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=49&auth=d69f95f4efacf867c69a972cdd5a55dbc8b663a4&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
(carrot and orange, for comparison:)
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=0&body=133&bodygene=1&breed=12&element=2&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=128&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=133&auth=6bc0da624ef30ccde1cd76e0fa186019544e9ba4&dummyext=prev.png[/img][img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=0&body=47&bodygene=1&breed=12&element=2&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=47&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=47&auth=daaaf27598c3079f92d2ff0a08ccee9c3d7095f1&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
I'm pretty sure this isn’t normal lighting for foam and it only appears for certain colours.
so far i've encountered this with cerulean, robin, cyan, cantaloupe, moss and antique
but using the randomize colour in the scrying workshop it seems to appear on quite a few other colours
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=89&bodygene=114&breed=1&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=75&tertgene=10&winggene=113&wings=89&auth=ddcf298a15889ed6f782be44131cbb830ac38607&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=89&bodygene=114&breed=1&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=75&tertgene=10&winggene=113&wings=115&auth=803930f1a6512474ed2dcd60c9e2f5760670ddc8&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=89&bodygene=114&breed=1&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=75&tertgene=10&winggene=113&wings=97&auth=3b2d3153d7b1cb5e03f522b332302341938f7820&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
I'm pretty sure this isn’t normal lighting for foam and it only appears for certain colours.
so far i've encountered this with cerulean, robin, cyan, cantaloupe, moss and antique
but using the randomize colour in the scrying workshop it seems to appear on quite a few other colours
I'm unsure if it is intentional, but it looks like there's not any or enough blending on baby guardian wings.
Observe, adult, seamless color transition at the wing joint
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=97&bodygene=82&breed=2&element=6&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=118&tertgene=0&winggene=82&wings=73&auth=d847dd37e994d754f25700c3253eb96c16819933&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
and then the baby
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=0&body=97&bodygene=82&breed=2&element=6&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=118&tertgene=0&winggene=82&wings=73&auth=844fcb2685fee8c50a000e8b9ce328c9550330ca&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
It's most jarring with flaunt flair, but I can see it in other genes too
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=0&body=97&bodygene=16&breed=2&element=6&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=118&tertgene=0&winggene=22&wings=73&auth=bda67be757d806ea705fe0679cce844d1ea973a0&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
which then makes me confused if it's a gene problem or not. I'm not sure what this is, or if it counts for this thread. So so so sorry if it does not, i don't mean to bother <3
I'm unsure if it is intentional, but it looks like there's not any or enough blending on baby guardian wings.
Observe, adult, seamless color transition at the wing joint
and then the baby
It's most jarring with flaunt flair, but I can see it in other genes too
which then makes me confused if it's a gene problem or not. I'm not sure what this is, or if it counts for this thread. So so so sorry if it does not, i don't mean to bother <3
|
ignore pls I can't figure out how signatures work, just click the buttons
|
|
// +3 FR time
