Stained and Wish for sure. Stained is basically an overlay and I keep thinking Wish is a treasure gene like Kumo
Soap is another weird one. It feels more like a Baldwin gene to me, though at the same time I can see it being a gem gene because it is like a shinier stained (which really makes it weird for Stained to be a gem gene--)
Stained and Wish for sure. Stained is basically an overlay and I keep thinking Wish is a treasure gene like Kumo
Soap is another weird one. It feels more like a Baldwin gene to me, though at the same time I can see it being a gem gene because it is like a shinier stained (which really makes it weird for Stained to be a gem gene--)
|
Redz || #253463
} She/Her
} FR +2
|
Glowtail definitely feels like a Baldwin gene to me
Glowtail definitely feels like a Baldwin gene to me
Stained and Wish. Stained is the, frankly, laziest possible gene. And Wish is like a worse Smoke.
Stained and Wish. Stained is the, frankly, laziest possible gene. And Wish is like a worse Smoke.
Wait wait wait Twinkle/Flicker and Wicker/Woven are GEM GENES??????????? I found out Wish wasn't a Treasure gene with the expansion to modern breeds, but I NEVER knew these two pairs also aren't.
Wait wait wait Twinkle/Flicker and Wicker/Woven are GEM GENES??????????? I found out Wish wasn't a Treasure gene with the expansion to modern breeds, but I NEVER knew these two pairs also aren't.
tbh im fine with most "treasure looking" gem genes but. wish. no.
tbh im fine with most "treasure looking" gem genes but. wish. no.
Never know Wicker/Woven are gem genes until now +1
Twinkle/Flicker aren't very visually impressive either but they at least display the accent colors...
Stain requires the least amount of art work, but their effect is very substantial, so I get it (I do wish they're treasure genes tho)
Never know Wicker/Woven are gem genes until now +1
Twinkle/Flicker aren't very visually impressive either but they at least display the accent colors...
Stain requires the least amount of art work, but their effect is very substantial, so I get it (I do wish they're treasure genes tho)
Just a heads-up: I usually delete the threads I made before it reaches 10 replies because I want to keep my forum history tidy.
To be clear, "Stained is a gem gene?!" confusion has been going on since it was released. Thanks for the flashbacks :'D
I'm a little confused as to why Plumage is a gem gene when it doesn't have any kind of unique shading whatsoever. Also TIL Pinions was a gem gene.
What's most baffling to me is how Bright/Vivid AREN'T gem genes. Huh?
To be clear, "Stained is a gem gene?!" confusion has been going on since it was released. Thanks for the flashbacks :'D
I'm a little confused as to why Plumage is a gem gene when it doesn't have any kind of unique shading whatsoever. Also TIL Pinions was a gem gene.
What's most baffling to me is how Bright/Vivid AREN'T gem genes. Huh?
Always baffles me stained is 2k gems. Yeah people use it as a tert saver so it's desirable for that but it's a colour overlay.
Always baffles me stained is 2k gems. Yeah people use it as a tert saver so it's desirable for that but it's a colour overlay.
OK now that I've had time to rest, I come to you with an example of the reverse: I thought Paradise was a gem gene when it came out [emoji=auraboa scared size=2]
OK now that I've had time to rest, I come to you with an example of the reverse: I thought Paradise was a gem gene when it came out
