The new Fern gene on adult female Imperial dragons always displays the accent color as a deep read, no matter the primary color. Every other species and gender just uses a slightly darker shade of the base color.
TOPIC | Fern gene error on Imperial females
The new Fern gene on adult female Imperial dragons always displays the accent color as a deep read, no matter the primary color. Every other species and gender just uses a slightly darker shade of the base color.
came here to report the same thing! it does this for paisley too.
here's some images
storm on imp
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=19&bodygene=136&breed=8&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=1&tert=40&tertgene=0&winggene=136&wings=19&auth=4d0c398096e3306df861c463999c9a072c4caa81&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
vs skydancer
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=19&bodygene=136&breed=13&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=1&tert=40&tertgene=0&winggene=136&wings=19&auth=303a123bbaa92a31f2627ad8969430824192504f&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
I was about to post about this. It's such a bizarre yet beautiful bug.
ETA: This made me look at ancient breeds and sure enough, female Banescales also have a deep red hue blended into their horns, spines, and underbelly with fern. No matter the primary colour. Males and hatchlings do not. Secondary is not affected.
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=137&bodygene=137&breed=18&element=2&eyetype=10&gender=1&tert=2&tertgene=0&winggene=137&wings=37&auth=72883029cbee974d0a8e7d7ecc62cc5569eb3364&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=2&bodygene=137&breed=18&element=2&eyetype=10&gender=1&tert=2&tertgene=0&winggene=137&wings=37&auth=e40c4857abe5c79d2b1256640b4de59a3cbd769a&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=110&bodygene=137&breed=18&element=2&eyetype=10&gender=1&tert=2&tertgene=0&winggene=137&wings=2&auth=e91dafb027f0883f0b06d4d89d8a8f6923355c61&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
I was about to post about this. It's such a bizarre yet beautiful bug.
ETA: This made me look at ancient breeds and sure enough, female Banescales also have a deep red hue blended into their horns, spines, and underbelly with fern. No matter the primary colour. Males and hatchlings do not. Secondary is not affected.
ETA: This made me look at ancient breeds and sure enough, female Banescales also have a deep red hue blended into their horns, spines, and underbelly with fern. No matter the primary colour. Males and hatchlings do not. Secondary is not affected.
Came here to report this as well. It was so striking that at first I was wondering if it was intentional until I switched the breed hahah
Ditto. It's really a gorgeous error, though... Consider this my vote for a gene that intentionally has a consistent blood-red component across all colors, like piebald with white and pharaoh with black.
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=165&bodygene=136&breed=8&element=2&eyetype=0&gender=1&tert=31&tertgene=0&winggene=136&wings=121&auth=095420906c3a06e71e28ff7256327bd9eced05d7&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
Ditto. It's really a gorgeous error, though... Consider this my vote for a gene that intentionally has a consistent blood-red component across all colors, like piebald with white and pharaoh with black.
I noticed the Bane F error pretty quickly, and I'm guessing that the dark red with them and Imp F are because that's maybe the color the genes were drawn in, and something went wrong/got overlooked with whatever bits of code are supposed to recolor them.
I noticed the Bane F error pretty quickly, and I'm guessing that the dark red with them and Imp F are because that's maybe the color the genes were drawn in, and something went wrong/got overlooked with whatever bits of code are supposed to recolor them.
___Art Heap! ___Avatar derg! | ___ | ___ |