So im runnin between classes real fast and i have an interview i need to prep for, so I'll deal with the whole Storm thing later, the short version is that::
She's gone too detailed to be still lying, specifically because its very easily disproven, so the miller thing is, unfortunately probably the truth
But I did want to answer this::
FeebleNeedle wrote on 2023-04-28 09:16:00:
@
ArtMajor
I disagree with your calling most of my posts fluff. Do you consider anything that isn’t analysis fluff? I swear I wrote all of my D1 posts with the specific idea in mind of trying to discuss topics relevant to our current discussions and putting new takes (even though I looked back and saw that one take was a bit silly from my tiredness, haha).
I didn’t have any analysis to make because I’m unfamiliar in this environment and with these players + it was D1- which is something I reiterate several times over as an explanation for myself if anybody was reading me, or even as a way of asking for/inviting others’ opinions on whatever I was discussing, but you seem to have taken those inclusions as me simply saying that I had nothing to say at all?
The only posts I’d consider fluff may be the back-and-forth I had with modgod, but that has been genuinely helpful for me, honestly
So I consider things that dont
add to the conversation or that are generally just lol funny posts to be fluff, allow me to elaborate, by explaining in order how I understood your posts:
Introduction - in its own category, saying hi, giving your general thoughts
1 - I consider this one to, while it does have some good stuff in it, to be more fluff than meat. You just give a "y'all agree i should be more talkative", then there is a little bit about word bombers, but you then spend a paragraph on saying "wow this was ominous" and that paragraph just felt very circular, and the last paragraph was just your opinion on not d1-elimming the mod.
2 - feels like role/ability baiting like "Oh we dont know what this means, what is she referring to" but doesn't have any self speculation, just like "huh it must refer to something we dont know about yet, wonder what that is"
3 I consider this fluff, since it doesnt really connect to any discussion happening around it, and is just "Hey how meta am i allowed to get here"
4 response to the response given to the above post, fluff / side conversation.
5 - You talk about your sleep schedule, then say you agree with what's already been said about leaving the lightning event alone for the time being, you then bump lyre's list, and the only bit i think is really meat -- actually you talking and not saying "yes i agree" is your introspective of yourself. This is the one that I refer to in my post without directly quoting it
6 Here you just point out people who've already been listed in the town trio, and kinda just refresh that the two had townread the top three townreads d1. There is some meat here in that you're addressing people who townread you, and then asking about d1 elims and if we should shift topics back onto that.
7 this post for me is just a lot of fluff because its you saying "I'm voting no elim, because I want to get my vote in, and that seems to be general consensus at the moment" Like, yes it is good to know why people do it, but for a no elim, at least personally I consider it to be a bit more on the fluff rather than meat side, because its just "This is the way majority is talking because there's too much we dont know, so im getting it out there that im voting along these lines"
8 the post i quoted and talked about
9 just a short post of talking about the hero/villain thing and asking storia a question
and then your most recent.
So yeah that's how I understood your posts, and why I classified them as majority fluff
Cutbug
