@
Morigan
i can't imagine that exit helped exactly with diplomacy, but... well, what can you do if they're not gonna listen to ya? :D
the style preference makes sense, honestly. i have heard that some people dislike centered text when there's lots of lines of varying width, though, as it's more work for the eyes (there's no easy line on the right or left for the eyes to head towards)
"How much could one really feel for characters in a book?" lots, evidently!! oops :P
a general tip with your writing is that it should still be clear what is going on when a person reads it at first, even if they don't have the full context of the situation (see: beginning chapters of books). most wouldn't want to read a book if they opened up the first page and saw a lot of vaguely ominous text but didn't understand anything happening! the reader wants to be let in on the action. of course, it's awesome if rereading/getting more info gives you some extra perspective, but generally you should still aim for some clarity and a sense of what is happening with the reader, on the first read-through. (which can be hard to do since, as an author, you have a much better sense of what, exactly, is occurring.)
i like the poem/prose, but i don't understand a lot of what's happening in it. for example, who is 'she?' who is 'he?' who is the narrator? what does it mean by 'original'? what choice? what chance? it's understandable that since the thread is more about snippets than long narratives that ominous writing without much explanation is written, but a good thing to keep in mind when you put it all together is to explain things first!
@
ZipZapZoom
i. oops? XD
to be fair, most audiences won't have devoured the entirety of the encyclopedia, so it's a bit of a hit or miss with the tundra motivation there. i have read it now, though! and honestly, so much stuff makes sense now. i really need to reread the ff bits again, the added knowledge would be interesting!
trundle trying to be a tundra like grum is adorable, though. random thought, how do breed changes work in your lore? would trundle ever consider one?
i do like the affinity/knowledges coming from the parents. is it nature or nurture, though? (i.e. were they raised to know the information or just naturally had a knack for it?) could they actually wield the elemental magic?
@
Cotinga
it makes sense! comedic under-reactions are great, but hard to get right, because it still needs to be realistic to hit. just be sure that the character internally acknowledges it in some way! amythest did say that it was weird, but there was no mention of what she was feeling in the moment, or her emotions towards the encounter. you always want to let the reader in on what the character is feeling. describe it! explain it! For example, in the serthis punishment text, you could say something like 'She felt guilty, but they had to die. There was no other way." it explains her emotion (guilt) as well as a reason for it!
honestly, the poor serthis... was it capable of higher thought, and knowledge of consequence, considering how young it was? it feels a bit like executing a dog that tried to attack the president—most would call that animal abuse, not justice. to be fair, that perspective can also be dehumanizing (dedragonizing??) because beastclans aren't considered on the same level of personhood as dragons in canon, but you also wouldn't murder a two-year old kid who tried to attack the prez... agh. maybe it's just the sornieth society, like medieval human society, and the levels of wrongness with it.
there's also something disturbing about the fact that cotinga had a choice between two, both rather cruel methods of execution to kill the serthis, but not a choice to just let it go free. were her hands tied in some way? did the clan leader order her to do it? (i'm glad she at least decided to show a little mercy in the end, even if it might not mean much...)