Quote:
It was made to make breeding more interesting instead of making it more like a chore.
"Interesting" is very subjective. That's the problem. Some people love games that are more gambling and RNG. Other people hate gambling mechanics and RNG. From how FR was first introduced, it was more towards the latter, so it got an audience who likes the latter. Yes, there's some players who like gambles. However, had FR wanted to be a mutation/random/RNG/uncontrolled breeding sim from the getgo, it should have been one from the getgo. Then it could have attracted its true audience.
The fact is that individual eye vials wouldn't take away from random breeding. If people want to try the RNG for eye hatches, they can still do that. And for people who want to give their old dragons new eyes, they would have that option too.
Win/Win.
Quote:
it makes the breeding a little more realistic, as you don't always get what you want with real life breeding
We can breed faes with imperials. This never was realistic. We don't do recessive genes or alleles or anything else. The eye update goes in the face of what FR was founded on. Things don't need to be realistic.
We always have been able to get what we want. That's the selling point of FR. If we want specific colors, we know what we need to get those. We know gene rarity. We knew what we had to work for to achieve a goal. This update has massively moved the posts. That's not fun. Being virtually unable to breed for your dream dragon is against the heart of FR.
Plus, as I said above, if people do want variety, they can. Breed big color ranges and gem to treasure genes. People can have random if they choose. But this has forced random on people who never wanted it.
Quote:
I feel that releasing individual vials for individual types will kill it's rarity and will eliminate the whole mutation aspect of it
The rarity is already dead. I just sold one multi and two facets for fodder because there is no rarity. It's not "special" any more to hatch a Big Three eyes. Now, you need to hatch those eyes on pretty dragons, which is again subjective.
And that brings us right back to where FR was before the update. Only desirable dragons are special. Eyes don't change that. They just roadblock people with old dragons, progens, and Gen 1s and those trying to breed for their dream dragons.
Quote:
they aren't associated with flights, so I have a hard time understanding how they would work in an event.
This is a long thread, so it's understandable if not every post was read. In it, many ways to release individual vials were discussed: NotN, each festival, MP, GMP...And really, the first post outlines one possible method. I don't think that post was thoroughly read:
Primal Sight - Coli during festivals
Multi - Baldwin
Facet - Swipp
If the confusion is how the first one on that list would work...it'd be a Coli drop. Like chests and much rarer than currency, during the festivals.
Quote:
which would somewhat preserve their rarity.
What rarity are we trying to preserve here? The eyes or the scattervials? Because breeding for eyes has already been shot. And the Vials? You know this isn't about the scattervials but a new item, right? But anyway, why keep an important item as a diminishing resource? I do not agree with people playing for one weekend and then milking others later on. And I speak as one who could profit greatly from forever retired scattervials.
Also, one thing that seems to be overlooked.
Existing dragons were all but excluded from this update. The scattervials are too rare and too unbalanced to effectively cover all the need to apply new eyes to old dragons. This includes special lineages, unique IDs, special birthdates, progens, personal favorites, sentimental dragons, and any existing dragon a player may not want to part with. That's five years worth of players and lairs cut off from this feature. "Preserving the rarity" so new babies are "special" does nothing to solve this problem at all. And we're not going to stop pushing a remedy for this issue until we can get new eyes on old dragons whether that be cycling scattervials, individual eye vials, and/or legacy eyes.
Pings are disabled.
If writers are supposed to "show not tell," why are we called "storytellers" and not "storyshow-ers"?