McAlli wrote on 2024-07-26 07:52:48:
...
It's fine lmao! I think it's hard to imagine bc the map is actually quite squanched, but if you read the blurb it says the Sea is "so vast that [someone on the shore] could only see the faint silhouettes of the land on the horizons". Which the map does NOT do justice lmao
Actually that would imply that the sea is much, much smaller then you'd expect. The horizon is only a few miles away on Earth, being able to see the far shore at all would make the sea of a thousand currents much, much smaller then any sea or even any of the great lakes on Earth.
I've been on normal sized lakes where I could faintly see the land on the far end. It's... not much of a feat.
Edit:
So to put some numbers on this, if an imp is 10 m tall, and the planet is roughly the size of Earth (I believe it's canonically a bit bigger? But I'm not tracking that down right now) then the horizon is roughly 11.3 km, or 7 miles away.
The smallest lake with a given length on the
Wikipedia "List of Largest Lakes" has a length of 75 km / 47 miles.
7 miles across is a respectable lake, but not actually a large one. And for a sea it's nothing.
Edit 2 because I'm board:
So if the sea of a thousand currents has a width of 11.3 km / 7 miles, as estimated above, and is roughly circular, which it looks on the map, it has an area of about 100 km / 38.5 miles, which would make it about the 132nd largest lake in Europe. AKA the continent that doesn't have any of the actually big lakes in it.
Sornith's total size relative to Scandinavia if you take that blurb about the sea of a thousand currents size at face value: