TOPIC | [T] [Art] Incorrect Gene Colors
Not sure if this is the right forum/thread but veilspun of both genders and with all colors and elements have issues with clipping when it comes to using multigaze and the beetle tert.
[url=https://ibb.co/S0c61FX][img]https://i.ibb.co/Gk9d1zv/Screen-Shot-2021-03-24-at-1-12-27-PM.png[/img][/url]
[url=https://ibb.co/tQNp6Vr][img]https://i.ibb.co/4KDRLhr/Screen-Shot-2021-03-24-at-1-14-00-PM.png[/img][/url]
@BeastsOfTheRiver
This is known and intentional due to how the image generation system works (eyes are always on top of everything minus apparel).
This is known and intentional due to how the image generation system works (eyes are always on top of everything minus apparel).
@BeastsOfTheRiver
This is known and intentional due to how the image generation system works (eyes are always on top of everything minus apparel).
This is known and intentional due to how the image generation system works (eyes are always on top of everything minus apparel).
Charcoal skink is missing part of the pattern, there are no circles. All breeds, both genders, hatchlings included. Shown on my new hatchling, aged up:
Normal skink for reference on a sibling (gender swapped)
Not sure if this has been reported yet, please tell me if it's intentional!
Normal skink for reference on a sibling (gender swapped)
Not sure if this has been reported yet, please tell me if it's intentional!
@Zephyr735 charcoal skink does have the pattern, it is just aaaaaalmost the same color as the base. It's easier to see without a tert like runes overlapping it, and on a breed where the pattern is larger.
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=7&bodygene=15&breed=9&element=5&eyetype=0&gender=1&tert=15&tertgene=0&winggene=0&wings=74&auth=3e881c1324786b4401228261cceb1cdcf75cb9fa&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
Increasing the contrast is definitely something that could be considered, but as it is, it's not actually "broken." Hope this helped!
@Zephyr735 charcoal skink does have the pattern, it is just aaaaaalmost the same color as the base. It's easier to see without a tert like runes overlapping it, and on a breed where the pattern is larger.
Increasing the contrast is definitely something that could be considered, but as it is, it's not actually "broken." Hope this helped!
Increasing the contrast is definitely something that could be considered, but as it is, it's not actually "broken." Hope this helped!
This has probably been brought up before and I just can't find it, but Runes on Gaoler males isn't covering a section of their horn, behind their wing. It's just a tiny section, but now that I've seen it I can't un-see it
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=26&bodygene=31&breed=17&element=6&eyetype=6&gender=0&tert=152&tertgene=32&winggene=77&wings=125&auth=ae2a075b7a59d07bb68c9fc5327a657617ed50c4&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
With Runes
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=26&bodygene=31&breed=17&element=6&eyetype=6&gender=0&tert=152&tertgene=0&winggene=77&wings=125&auth=d69777fdd5ae1eca36ddfe38f7eecdf481acbe63&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
Without Runes
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/dressing-room/scry?sdid=984129&skin=37922&apparel=&xt=dressing.png[/img]
With the skin that I first noticed it on
Hey, I hope this goes here (I'm super sorry if it should go somewhere else ;__;), but I just went into "predict morphology" and was greeted by this
[img]https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/776815030556819498/828030170472513566/unknown.png[/img]
Lead Koi causes the image to not show up at all on tundra hatchlings, it works perfectly fine on adult tundras though
Hey, I hope this goes here (I'm super sorry if it should go somewhere else ;__;), but I just went into "predict morphology" and was greeted by this
Lead Koi causes the image to not show up at all on tundra hatchlings, it works perfectly fine on adult tundras though
Lead Koi causes the image to not show up at all on tundra hatchlings, it works perfectly fine on adult tundras though
I've noticed an odd, white shadow on a lot of the Runes genes but I don't think this was intentional....
Red Runes:
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=86&bodygene=68&breed=19&element=2&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=62&tertgene=57&winggene=66&wings=121&auth=c163c0b5ac4aee91ee13d07aa8dcf17accee06f7&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=86&bodygene=0&breed=19&element=2&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=62&tertgene=57&winggene=0&wings=121&auth=d0c5f3f936024398d688da98bbf0229a96bad510&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
Similar issue with Ringlets shadow on male banescales
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=86&bodygene=47&breed=18&element=2&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=62&tertgene=40&winggene=51&wings=121&auth=32f9c80599d5ce478c757224ec743fa0054b9099&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
I've noticed an odd, white shadow on a lot of the Runes genes but I don't think this was intentional....
Red Runes:
Similar issue with Ringlets shadow on male banescales
Red Runes:
Similar issue with Ringlets shadow on male banescales
•Ripley •Queer •He/Him •Aquarius •Art Shop : Working | __ |
[quote name="dontuworry" date="2021-03-24 10:48:12" ]
[quote name="dontuworry" date="2021-02-14 02:36:41" ]
Just noticed this when showcasing my perma boy to some others - The primal art crosses over the fur on the face. It's not a problem with the gene or colours, it's with all types, so I'm not sure why it hasn't been pointed out yet.
[url=https://www1.flightrising.com/dragon/64815619][img]https://www1.flightrising.com/rendern/350/648157/64815619_350.png[/img][/url]
[img]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-0O_3cdERp5E/YCj9DgI2VcI/AAAAAAAAPGc/l2jS7klBkhktQ1StDVKQpgJj3-1OlGOigCK8BGAsYHg/s0/2021-02-14.png[/img]
[/quote]
[/quote]
I think that's intentional, the runes are magical and might levitate slightly above the face
dontuworry wrote on 2021-03-24 10:48:12:
@LuckOfTheClaws nah, this is 100% certainly an error. you can see it from the hard jagged edges and inconsistent filling. if it was intended for the runes to levitate above the face, there would be no random jagged pixels scattered all over the place, and the glow effect would not be appearing and disappearing with no clear sensical consistency.
this does not look like it was intended for them to glow through the mane either, because then the glow would shine through in middle where its strongest rather than middles being blank and glow appearing only at edges with sharp inner edges.
this does not look like it was intended for them to glow through the mane either, because then the glow would shine through in middle where its strongest rather than middles being blank and glow appearing only at edges with sharp inner edges.
@LuckOfTheClaws nah, this is 100% certainly an error. you can see it from the hard jagged edges and inconsistent filling. if it was intended for the runes to levitate above the face, there would be no random jagged pixels scattered all over the place, and the glow effect would not be appearing and disappearing with no clear sensical consistency.
this does not look like it was intended for them to glow through the mane either, because then the glow would shine through in middle where its strongest rather than middles being blank and glow appearing only at edges with sharp inner edges.
this does not look like it was intended for them to glow through the mane either, because then the glow would shine through in middle where its strongest rather than middles being blank and glow appearing only at edges with sharp inner edges.