|
|
|
Poison | Ecto/Ect | Artist | +3 FR Time
Accent Shop The Library | Wishlist | Oilslick Quest | Icon Dragon |
|
|
Forum Games
Play word and forum games here.
TOPIC | The User Below Me Gets (UMS/A version)
@Facets
Claim please!
TUBMG:
[item=accent: starspun woods] or [item=accent: buried alive] or [item=skin: hellfire]
Edit: added another option!
|
- ALPH PHRUSSIA He/him | FR+15 » About me » Avatar » Accent Shop |
[quote name="Aequorin" date="2023-12-28 12:21:08" ]
The section about "thread killers" in the opening post has received an edit.
It's okay to describe the attributes of skins or accent designs that do well in a forum game like this one.
It's okay to describe the attributes of skin or accent designs that don't do well in a forum game like this one.
It's NOT okay to call out specific skins or accents.
As a general reminder for everyone, skins and accents are created by your fellow players. When you call out a skin or accent in a negative fashion, you are calling out a fellow player.
[/quote]
@Aequorin
I think it would be pertinent to discuss the words "target audience", what they mean, and how they have no positive or negative value associated with an artists skill. Especially considering most of the 'thread killers' have very little in common with each other to even begin to categorize them into common attributes, the only thing that sets them apart is that the target audience doesn't seem to play this thread game. Though you're welcome to try and categorize them if you want to.
No one was saying these were banned skins, only that they stalled the thread for a day or more at a time, more often than not repeatedly, simply because the target audience for those skins do not frequently play this thread game. If that has a negative impact on the artist, that seems like a personal issue that is no one elses fault and should be worked on in private. The fact of the matter is that they have stalled the thread, sometimes several times, and there's just no getting around that. What does numbers on Twitter might flop on Tumblr and so on, that's just how engagement and target audience in art online works.
The rule was you had to offer a secondary option, which was a good compromise to keep the thread alive. No one was criticizing or saying negative things about these skins this whole time. What I consider unfair is how much the thread owner had to step in and offer a skin themselves, or other people had to put a second skin into the mix with nothing in return just to keep the thread moving.
Aequorin wrote on 2023-12-28 12:21:08:
The section about "thread killers" in the opening post has received an edit.
It's okay to describe the attributes of skins or accent designs that do well in a forum game like this one.
It's okay to describe the attributes of skin or accent designs that don't do well in a forum game like this one.
It's NOT okay to call out specific skins or accents.
As a general reminder for everyone, skins and accents are created by your fellow players. When you call out a skin or accent in a negative fashion, you are calling out a fellow player.
It's okay to describe the attributes of skins or accent designs that do well in a forum game like this one.
It's okay to describe the attributes of skin or accent designs that don't do well in a forum game like this one.
It's NOT okay to call out specific skins or accents.
As a general reminder for everyone, skins and accents are created by your fellow players. When you call out a skin or accent in a negative fashion, you are calling out a fellow player.
@Aequorin
I think it would be pertinent to discuss the words "target audience", what they mean, and how they have no positive or negative value associated with an artists skill. Especially considering most of the 'thread killers' have very little in common with each other to even begin to categorize them into common attributes, the only thing that sets them apart is that the target audience doesn't seem to play this thread game. Though you're welcome to try and categorize them if you want to.
No one was saying these were banned skins, only that they stalled the thread for a day or more at a time, more often than not repeatedly, simply because the target audience for those skins do not frequently play this thread game. If that has a negative impact on the artist, that seems like a personal issue that is no one elses fault and should be worked on in private. The fact of the matter is that they have stalled the thread, sometimes several times, and there's just no getting around that. What does numbers on Twitter might flop on Tumblr and so on, that's just how engagement and target audience in art online works.
The rule was you had to offer a secondary option, which was a good compromise to keep the thread alive. No one was criticizing or saying negative things about these skins this whole time. What I consider unfair is how much the thread owner had to step in and offer a skin themselves, or other people had to put a second skin into the mix with nothing in return just to keep the thread moving.
     
|
@Alphrussia claim please
Id love buried alive
Tubmg
[item=Skin: Lmn-What the Aether F] OR [item=Accent: Low]
