@Jamethyst
Awesome stuff! I'll get it updated in a bit~
Awesome stuff! I'll get it updated in a bit~
-Sig by OmicronWanderer-
Guides
Community created guides, helpful strategies, and more.
TOPIC | Breeding Rarity Findings!
@Jamethyst
Just double-checking, I believe your Basic vs Gembond numbers are flipped and have entered them as 96 Basic, 4 Gembond. Do let me know if that's in error. ^_^
Front numbers are updated!
Just double-checking, I believe your Basic vs Gembond numbers are flipped and have entered them as 96 Basic, 4 Gembond. Do let me know if that's in error. ^_^
Front numbers are updated!
@Jamethyst
Just double-checking, I believe your Basic vs Gembond numbers are flipped and have entered them as 96 Basic, 4 Gembond. Do let me know if that's in error. ^_^
Front numbers are updated!
Just double-checking, I believe your Basic vs Gembond numbers are flipped and have entered them as 96 Basic, 4 Gembond. Do let me know if that's in error. ^_^
Front numbers are updated!
-Sig by OmicronWanderer-
@JessDwarf
Oh, woops. Could you tell I was tired when I uploaded that? Haha, yes that's definitely an error on my behalf, so sorry about that! :''D
Oh, woops. Could you tell I was tired when I uploaded that? Haha, yes that's definitely an error on my behalf, so sorry about that! :''D
@JessDwarf
Oh, woops. Could you tell I was tired when I uploaded that? Haha, yes that's definitely an error on my behalf, so sorry about that! :''D
Oh, woops. Could you tell I was tired when I uploaded that? Haha, yes that's definitely an error on my behalf, so sorry about that! :''D
@Jamethyst
No problem! ^_^ There's a reason I only update this at certain times in the day - working with numbers when distracted or tired is asking for trouble, so I totally understand. XD
No problem! ^_^ There's a reason I only update this at certain times in the day - working with numbers when distracted or tired is asking for trouble, so I totally understand. XD
@Jamethyst
No problem! ^_^ There's a reason I only update this at certain times in the day - working with numbers when distracted or tired is asking for trouble, so I totally understand. XD
No problem! ^_^ There's a reason I only update this at certain times in the day - working with numbers when distracted or tired is asking for trouble, so I totally understand. XD
-Sig by OmicronWanderer-
@JessDwarf
Thank you, and I'll make sure to double-check my numbers more carefully in the future!
Going to just edit the numbers the right way around in my post now... XD
Thank you, and I'll make sure to double-check my numbers more carefully in the future!
Going to just edit the numbers the right way around in my post now... XD
@JessDwarf
Thank you, and I'll make sure to double-check my numbers more carefully in the future!
Going to just edit the numbers the right way around in my post now... XD
Thank you, and I'll make sure to double-check my numbers more carefully in the future!
Going to just edit the numbers the right way around in my post now... XD
@TheAtomicBon @Nayafen
Your numbers from the Lightning thread have been added here! ^_^
For testing Underbelly, it is recommended to be using a particularly bright tertiary colour (and one other experimenter had luck with Tundras as their beard colour would indicate the presence of the gene or not). I can't enter approximate values without damaging the usefulness of the data we've gathered, so when testing subtle genes it is encouraged to find indisputable ways of determining its presence to ensure good results.
Has anyone else noticed good tell-tales for Underbelly based on species colouration patterns? Or can give a more detailed explanation of what to look for with Tundras? I'm only recalling something second-hand, as I don't own any Underbelly pairs myself.
Your numbers from the Lightning thread have been added here! ^_^
For testing Underbelly, it is recommended to be using a particularly bright tertiary colour (and one other experimenter had luck with Tundras as their beard colour would indicate the presence of the gene or not). I can't enter approximate values without damaging the usefulness of the data we've gathered, so when testing subtle genes it is encouraged to find indisputable ways of determining its presence to ensure good results.
Has anyone else noticed good tell-tales for Underbelly based on species colouration patterns? Or can give a more detailed explanation of what to look for with Tundras? I'm only recalling something second-hand, as I don't own any Underbelly pairs myself.
@TheAtomicBon @Nayafen
Your numbers from the Lightning thread have been added here! ^_^
For testing Underbelly, it is recommended to be using a particularly bright tertiary colour (and one other experimenter had luck with Tundras as their beard colour would indicate the presence of the gene or not). I can't enter approximate values without damaging the usefulness of the data we've gathered, so when testing subtle genes it is encouraged to find indisputable ways of determining its presence to ensure good results.
Has anyone else noticed good tell-tales for Underbelly based on species colouration patterns? Or can give a more detailed explanation of what to look for with Tundras? I'm only recalling something second-hand, as I don't own any Underbelly pairs myself.
Your numbers from the Lightning thread have been added here! ^_^
For testing Underbelly, it is recommended to be using a particularly bright tertiary colour (and one other experimenter had luck with Tundras as their beard colour would indicate the presence of the gene or not). I can't enter approximate values without damaging the usefulness of the data we've gathered, so when testing subtle genes it is encouraged to find indisputable ways of determining its presence to ensure good results.
Has anyone else noticed good tell-tales for Underbelly based on species colouration patterns? Or can give a more detailed explanation of what to look for with Tundras? I'm only recalling something second-hand, as I don't own any Underbelly pairs myself.
-Sig by OmicronWanderer-
@JessDwarf
Well, I completely forgot to get some data from my WCs, I blame Dom and things being hectic lol.
I do have a crackled WC that's RTB significantly before her mate, so I can definitely get some points from her.
Well, I completely forgot to get some data from my WCs, I blame Dom and things being hectic lol.
I do have a crackled WC that's RTB significantly before her mate, so I can definitely get some points from her.
@JessDwarf
Well, I completely forgot to get some data from my WCs, I blame Dom and things being hectic lol.
I do have a crackled WC that's RTB significantly before her mate, so I can definitely get some points from her.
Well, I completely forgot to get some data from my WCs, I blame Dom and things being hectic lol.
I do have a crackled WC that's RTB significantly before her mate, so I can definitely get some points from her.
@JessDwarf
My crackle finally came off cooldown so I have more data for you! Since his intended isn't ready to breed for a few more days I may run these again (just not tonight lol)
Date of Experiment: Dec 14, 2013
Point of Difference Compared: Crackle Vs Underbelly
Results: Crackle 26, Underbelly 74
Point of Difference Compared: Plentiful (guardian) vs. Rare (wildclaw)
Results: Plentiful 99, Wildclaw 1
Point of Difference Compared: Crackle Vs Basic
Results: Crackle 16, Basic 84
Point of Difference Compared: Plentiful (guardian) vs Common (Snapper)
Results: Plentiful 76, Common 24
My crackle finally came off cooldown so I have more data for you! Since his intended isn't ready to breed for a few more days I may run these again (just not tonight lol)
Date of Experiment: Dec 14, 2013
Point of Difference Compared: Crackle Vs Underbelly
Results: Crackle 26, Underbelly 74
Point of Difference Compared: Plentiful (guardian) vs. Rare (wildclaw)
Results: Plentiful 99, Wildclaw 1
Point of Difference Compared: Crackle Vs Basic
Results: Crackle 16, Basic 84
Point of Difference Compared: Plentiful (guardian) vs Common (Snapper)
Results: Plentiful 76, Common 24
@JessDwarf
My crackle finally came off cooldown so I have more data for you! Since his intended isn't ready to breed for a few more days I may run these again (just not tonight lol)
Date of Experiment: Dec 14, 2013
Point of Difference Compared: Crackle Vs Underbelly
Results: Crackle 26, Underbelly 74
Point of Difference Compared: Plentiful (guardian) vs. Rare (wildclaw)
Results: Plentiful 99, Wildclaw 1
Point of Difference Compared: Crackle Vs Basic
Results: Crackle 16, Basic 84
Point of Difference Compared: Plentiful (guardian) vs Common (Snapper)
Results: Plentiful 76, Common 24
My crackle finally came off cooldown so I have more data for you! Since his intended isn't ready to breed for a few more days I may run these again (just not tonight lol)
Date of Experiment: Dec 14, 2013
Point of Difference Compared: Crackle Vs Underbelly
Results: Crackle 26, Underbelly 74
Point of Difference Compared: Plentiful (guardian) vs. Rare (wildclaw)
Results: Plentiful 99, Wildclaw 1
Point of Difference Compared: Crackle Vs Basic
Results: Crackle 16, Basic 84
Point of Difference Compared: Plentiful (guardian) vs Common (Snapper)
Results: Plentiful 76, Common 24
