[T] [Art] Incorrect Gene Colors | Bug Report Forums

I'm not sure if this has already been mentioned or not, but the Seraph gene on Fae dragons seems to have an error? You can see the Seraph pattern on the frill clear as day on hatchlings, but it's unusually absent on the adults, as demonstrated by two of my dragons. Hatchling with Seraph: [img]https://i.imgur.com/SkkNyam.png[/img] Adult male and female Fae with Seraph: [img]https://i.imgur.com/NnXc6Wh.png[/img] [img]https://i.imgur.com/yXgh3W4.png[/img]

BurrakuDusk

519

204

913

151

June 14, 2020 16:42:50

I'm not sure if this has already been mentioned or not, but the Seraph gene on Fae dragons seems to have an error? You can see the Seraph pattern on the frill clear as day on hatchlings, but it's unusually absent on the adults, as demonstrated by two of my dragons.

Hatchling with Seraph:

Adult male and female Fae with Seraph:

She/Her || FR +2

Last edited on Jun 14, 2020 16:46:50 by BurrakuDusk

[quote name="Medenadragon" date="2020-06-14 05:46:59" ] @siinfull [quote name="siinfull"] [sub]not sure if this is an art issue or not, but this thread showed on the homepage and it seemed like a sign to leave a comment; [columns][url=https://www1.flightrising.com/dragon/59773023][img]https://www1.flightrising.com/rendern/350/597731/59773023_350.png[/img][/url] [nextcol][img]https://i.imgur.com/p7R3nZ3.png[/img][/columns] something with the skydancer hatchlings appears to have a line run down, appearing lighter on one side than the other. it appears on other bases as well, tested by randomly generating a dragon then switching them to skydancer hatchling: [img]https://i.imgur.com/8BN9qoL.png[/img] *my apologies if the wording of this is bad, it's midnight forty-seven at the time of writing[/sub] [/quote] Im certain that this is intended, thats a flap of wing membrane connecting the thumb to the shoulder. The position of the wing means you're seeing the top of it there, as opposed to the underside, which is why its more saturated. [/quote] I thought this as well but look on the shoulder of the dragon. The line continues into the body and that doesn't seem right. In that area it seems like it should fade more smoothly as that's not a part of the wing.

SickViking

357

176

504

996

June 14, 2020 18:23:38

Medenadragon wrote on 2020-06-14 05:46:59:

@siinfull

siinfull wrote:

_{not sure if this is an art issue or not, but this thread showed on the homepage and it seemed like a sign to leave a comment;}

something with the skydancer hatchlings appears to have a line run down, appearing lighter on one side than the other. it appears on other bases as well, tested by randomly generating a dragon then switching them to skydancer hatchling:

*my apologies if the wording of this is bad, it's midnight forty-seven at the time of writing

Im certain that this is intended, thats a flap of wing membrane connecting the thumb to the shoulder. The position of the wing means you're seeing the top of it there, as opposed to the underside, which is why its more saturated.

I thought this as well but look on the shoulder of the dragon. The line continues into the body and that doesn't seem right. In that area it seems like it should fade more smoothly as that's not a part of the wing.

Matt | He/Him/His | Single | So Very Gay

[quote name="Ley" date="2020-06-14 06:18:30" ] For Lionfish in most species (with the possible exception of Guardians and Spirals), the contrast belly color appears on both the top and bottom of the tail, like so: [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=25&breed=10&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=103&tertgene=0&winggene=0&wings=1&auth=6b1d77469aa36ed3eb8cf7a11d65ae4fe09019af&dummyext=prev.png[/img] In both male and female Pearlcatchers, however, it appears only on the dorsal side: [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=25&breed=4&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=103&tertgene=0&winggene=0&wings=1&auth=b127616afa4074f100c1bf0ba22d739c6cb0655b&dummyext=prev.png[/img] [/quote] (Shortened the quote a bit.) @Ley @hungryhobbits Sorry if you didn't want to be pinged. This doesn't seem to be an error. The underside isn't colored because Pearlcatchers don't have bellies that extend to their tails. If you check this out with [url=https://www1.flightrising.com/scrying/predict?breed=4&gender=0&age=1&bodygene=25&body=10&winggene=24&wings=10&tertgene=5&tert=146&element=2&eyetype=1]Underbelly[/url], you'll see it extends there on most other breeds, but not on PCs. You can probably see this most clearly on [url=https://www1.flightrising.com/scrying/predict?breed=5&gender=0&age=1&bodygene=25&body=10&winggene=24&wings=10&tertgene=5&tert=146&element=2&eyetype=1]Ridgebacks[/url] since their belly extends just a bit past their hind legs. Lionfish utilizes this belly portion for the accent color and if there's none, it's just not there.

Mida

701

562

1211

2032

June 14, 2020 18:30:33

Ley wrote on 2020-06-14 06:18:30:

For Lionfish in most species (with the possible exception of Guardians and Spirals), the contrast belly color appears on both the top and bottom of the tail, like so:
dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=25&breed=10&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=103&tertgene=0&winggene=0&wings=1&auth=6b1d77469aa36ed3eb8cf7a11d65ae4fe09019af&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=25&breed=10&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=103&tertgene=0&winggene=0&wings=1&auth=6b1d77469aa36ed3eb8cf7a11d65ae4fe09019af&dummyext=prev.png

In both male and female Pearlcatchers, however, it appears only on the dorsal side:

dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=25&breed=4&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=103&tertgene=0&winggene=0&wings=1&auth=b127616afa4074f100c1bf0ba22d739c6cb0655b&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=25&breed=4&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=103&tertgene=0&winggene=0&wings=1&auth=b127616afa4074f100c1bf0ba22d739c6cb0655b&dummyext=prev.png

(Shortened the quote a bit.)

@Ley @hungryhobbits

Sorry if you didn't want to be pinged.

This doesn't seem to be an error. The underside isn't colored because Pearlcatchers don't have bellies that extend to their tails. If you check this out with Underbelly, you'll see it extends there on most other breeds, but not on PCs. You can probably see this most clearly on Ridgebacks since their belly extends just a bit past their hind legs. Lionfish utilizes this belly portion for the accent color and if there's none, it's just not there.

........

«Hiatus» Art Shop
«S» Baldwin Fodder

.............................

“ Unknown courage sleeps in your heart,
and when you realize
The downpour in your heart
Will surely stop

Show me your brave heart ”

................................................................

.....

Pixel art of a muted brown Veilspun with cool green wings. A whirl of green wind swirls around her.

....

Ringlets on Gaolers covers their paw pads! Not sure if this is intentional, but given that their pawpads are usually clean, I imagine it isn't. [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=168&bodygene=35&breed=17&element=1&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=113&tertgene=30&winggene=34&wings=132&auth=62282985b1bc9150c10ab72d0d98208cbf930527&dummyext=prev.png[/img] [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=168&bodygene=35&breed=17&element=1&eyetype=3&gender=1&tert=113&tertgene=30&winggene=34&wings=132&auth=21c182a975d301d5426ff1901aba4742320d9363&dummyext=prev.png[/img]

Risse

305

120

701

336

June 14, 2020 18:57:25

Ringlets on Gaolers covers their paw pads! Not sure if this is intentional, but given that their pawpads are usually clean, I imagine it isn't.

dragon?age=1&body=168&bodygene=35&breed=17&element=1&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=113&tertgene=30&winggene=34&wings=132&auth=62282985b1bc9150c10ab72d0d98208cbf930527&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=168&bodygene=35&breed=17&element=1&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=113&tertgene=30&winggene=34&wings=132&auth=62282985b1bc9150c10ab72d0d98208cbf930527&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=168&bodygene=35&breed=17&element=1&eyetype=3&gender=1&tert=113&tertgene=30&winggene=34&wings=132&auth=21c182a975d301d5426ff1901aba4742320d9363&dummyext=prev.png

@Medenadragon @SickViking
_{hello!! i dont remember making a post but boy are we in this now}

I'd take this as something intentional were it not for how jarringly straight the line goes. And were it not for the fact that in the second image provided, the limb appears transparent with the Eye Spots faded and running through it. The underside being lighter as you (Medena) say makes sense, but how this appears does not

The line does continue into the body in an unnatural way down from the wing to the arm of the dragon like you (SickViking) noted- there's something strange afoot with how the wing genes interact on the SD H bases

siinfull

0

71

45

113

June 14, 2020 19:40:23

@Medenadragon @SickViking
_{hello!! i dont remember making a post but boy are we in this now}

I'd take this as something intentional were it not for how jarringly straight the line goes. And were it not for the fact that in the second image provided, the limb appears transparent with the Eye Spots faded and running through it. The underside being lighter as you (Medena) say makes sense, but how this appears does not

The line does continue into the body in an unnatural way down from the wing to the arm of the dragon like you (SickViking) noted- there's something strange afoot with how the wing genes interact on the SD H bases

.

ABOUT

sin | any pronoun | FR +0

» adopts, » lair dragons, » den dragons

[quote name="RomeoMontagu" date="2020-06-14 03:28:22" ] [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=11&bodygene=1&breed=5&element=8&eyetype=10&gender=0&tert=104&tertgene=13&winggene=20&wings=104&auth=4bb2b4af0ddab3e5287c96f0571f1675d07424c0&dummyext=prev.png[/img] [img]https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/630917189268013060/721672100473077801/unknown.png[/img] Male Ridgebacks with Midnight/Iridescent primary have unshaded chest plates. Don't know if this was mentioned before. [/quote] This happens on every male Ridgeback color, actually! Though it is much more noticeable on darker colors [img]https://i.imgur.com/nepl68h.png[/img] [img]https://i.imgur.com/FH1hiQ6.png[/img] Also hijacking this to point out some other errors with male Ridgebacks [img]https://i.imgur.com/g3FIYdA.png[/img] There is a color/shading layer missing for Mist Seraph, and Ghost clips out of the lineart on the left foreleg [img]https://i.imgur.com/Zc9nONQ.png[/img] same scry (Orca Iri/Mist Seraph/Cyan Ghost) on a female Ridgeback for reference [img]https://i.imgur.com/tSp5aUq.png[/img]

EmeraldJubilee

300

114

274

3698

June 14, 2020 20:35:22

RomeoMontagu wrote on 2020-06-14 03:28:22:

dragon?age=1&body=11&bodygene=1&breed=5&element=8&eyetype=10&gender=0&tert=104&tertgene=13&winggene=20&wings=104&auth=4bb2b4af0ddab3e5287c96f0571f1675d07424c0&dummyext=prev.png

Male Ridgebacks with Midnight/Iridescent primary have unshaded chest plates. Don't know if this was mentioned before.

This happens on every male Ridgeback color, actually! Though it is much more noticeable on darker colors

Also hijacking this to point out some other errors with male Ridgebacks

There is a color/shading layer missing for Mist Seraph, and Ghost clips out of the lineart on the left foreleg

same scry (Orca Iri/Mist Seraph/Cyan Ghost) on a female Ridgeback for reference

she/her
ace/bi
+2 FR time
forever rambling

As a heads up, I may not respond to duplicate error reports! I appreciate you all taking the time to report things! ------------------------ [quote name="Solarae" date="2020-06-13 03:17:10" ] Adult male tundras with Sapphire Butterfly have jet black mane and tail fur that cover everything [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=112&bodygene=17&breed=6&element=8&eyetype=10&gender=0&tert=46&tertgene=23&winggene=13&wings=71&auth=abd925ff30310e930725849c6d512a659f9650bb&dummyext=prev.png[/img] Edit: Skydancers also have the black fur [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=111&bodygene=17&breed=13&element=7&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=22&tertgene=8&winggene=13&wings=71&auth=6d59fbdc3b7d3313b16779af39c0120b7f3becff&dummyext=prev.png[/img] But imperial and Pearlcatcher is fine [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=111&bodygene=17&breed=8&element=7&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=22&tertgene=8&winggene=13&wings=71&auth=b8ced5ffc6bf0429459a4a345a562c61d5e18d4f&dummyext=prev.png[/img] [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=111&bodygene=17&breed=4&element=7&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=22&tertgene=8&winggene=13&wings=71&auth=8e763f6d63f0287bc551b915502c0b16a48a5078&dummyext=prev.png[/img] [/quote] Thank you for the report. These should now be corrected. Note that this does affect all colors, as it ensures that the tundra and skydancers have a standard mane color rather than the darkest outline of the butterfly gene, which was inconsistently used in the mane area. -------------------------------- [quote name="Midorikage" date="2020-06-13 02:44:02" ] First: I'm glad some of the older bleeding issues and other more recent art errors were fixed! However they seem to have been picked from the last few pages of this thread, so I'm gonna post here a list of all the gene errors I've seen so far on this thread in the hope that it's useful to the devs to have them all in a single post! [quote][u]Genes that go outside the lines:[/u] - Underbelly on F bogs - Ghost on M ridges (front leg) - Smirch on F nocs (wings, head) - Cherub on M nocs (neck) - All secondaries on M coatls bleed onto the tail (butt wings) - Piebald on baby imps has stray pixels - Weathered bleeding on the wing pawpad of F gaolers - Bar and tiger in M wildclaws bleed onto the belly on the tail - Phantom on F gaolers clips onto the wing claw (dark of the tail) [u]Missing portions/colors:[/u] - Ultramarine seraph on all breeds - Okapi on baby guardians's back leg - Lionfish on baby imps (back leg missing stripes) - Nails on several breeds with jaguar - Nails on several breeds with lionfish - The uncolored bit on mist seraph of M ridges - Vermillion shimmer on F coatls has the wrong gradient - Current on M ridges (back wing) - Wrong colors in skydancers gems/antennaes with lionfish - Python on F PCs (missing accent color) - The eye-ridge of F tundras - Uncolored squares on F bogs W/lace (base of the wing) - Noxtide on F skydancers fluff (white patches) - Front feet on M spirals with laced - Capsule missing on baby tundra's belly - Unusual lightning eyes on baby mirrors show as water unusual - Tapir on M gaolers has an extra gradient on the left front foot - Toxin spearmint has wrong accent colors on BScales - Noxtide is missing the pattern on M coatls buttwing [u]Missing/misplaced shading/trasparency:[/u] - Iri/shim on the new colors - Noxtide on M nocs's frills - Noxtide on M PCs doesn't have shadow trasparency - Ringlets on all breeds, except F banescale - The missing plate on iridescent M ridges - Met/Alloy's highlights on fem nocs - Laced on baby skydancers bolder shading - Filigree on baby PCs is missing some lines on the side - Filigree on M snappers is missing some lines on the chin - Ice glimmer on F ridgebacks has the wrong shading color - The highlight for capsule on M faes follows the old lineart [u]Other:[/u] - Spines not following the spine of the dragon on some breeds - Seraph on M PCs (weird white line) - Capsule on M snappers (shoulder) - Capsule on M spirals[/quote] [/quote] Thank you for your organizational efforts. I'll be going through the thread myself, as being able to see the images directly can point me to what's wrong and whether or not it's an error or supposed to be like that. But I'll be sure to take a gander at this list a second time after I think I'm a bit closer to "wrapping things up" and see if there's something that I completely missed! ---------------------- [quote name="Nabesima" date="2020-06-13 05:10:49" ] Since the issues began gaining attention, I want to repeat a thing that'd been bothering me for years, that being the old issue with new IriShim lighting layer. It's been noted as something to be fixed back when the color wheel received its update. It's especially noticeable on Pearlcatchers for some reason, not as bad on most other breeds. Azure: [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=27&bodygene=1&breed=4&element=1&eyetype=1&gender=0&tert=19&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=27&auth=b6ce6cf7ed27e99fefaac7bd28ef312e83b74f68&dummyext=prev.png[/img] Abyss: [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=96&bodygene=1&breed=4&element=1&eyetype=1&gender=0&tert=19&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=96&auth=58aa767df4391ba7c9bb2be777eb3491ecaec734&dummyext=prev.png[/img] Magenta: [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=65&bodygene=1&breed=4&element=1&eyetype=1&gender=1&tert=19&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=65&auth=093f5a064ec396891bae4dc6db4e68a47f7990f7&dummyext=prev.png[/img] Fuchsia: [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=170&bodygene=1&breed=4&element=1&eyetype=1&gender=1&tert=19&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=170&auth=d16dd4cdcd8d2d120964789a5cfca8f019601a44&dummyext=prev.png[/img] The lighting layer seem to be significantly less transparent on the new colors. Notably it's not as bad on other breeds. Fuchsia on F Imperials: [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=170&bodygene=1&breed=8&element=1&eyetype=1&gender=1&tert=19&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=170&auth=cabe15d91251e039d5b7dbcf8e006c13c2ffa71a&dummyext=prev.png[/img] [/quote] Thank you for the report. We are not going to be making a decision on iridescent and shimmer until all the other genes are addressed. They're a big commitment to change, and have been on the site for quite a while. Each one (as I keep repeating like an annoying broken record - sorry about that!) is colored by hand and not by a generator, so inconsistencies will be present. The first 67 colors released on site were colored at a different time than the color wheel expansion, which may explain some of the differences. The first 67 colors generally have non-colored line art, wildly different hue shifts from dragon to dragon for the same color, and their highlights are a bit mushy. Many of the color expansion colors are more consistent from dragon to dragon for the same color, but have highlights that are too harsh, and some are pure white, which is not how iridescent should probably look. Note that we are working on an iridescent update for fae on colors 1-67 (the original pre-expansion colors), as they had black line art and pelvic bumps that are not consistent with the rest of fae art on site. So they have a true error, whereas the rest we are currently tagging as inconsistencies that we'll need to think about before basically redoing the entire gene. Apologies for the long-winded explanation! Thankfully we do not hand color genes anymore aside from this one, so errors can be more clearly recognized as such and things should (hopefully) be pretty standard! ------------------------------ [quote name="dragonNMR" date="2020-06-13 06:32:20" ] It’s been years since the genes petals and butterfly came out but there is still an error with butterfly on male imps with the lines going over the tail. Will this ever be addressed? [img]https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/296051596897550337/721353776899817472/image.png[/img] [img]https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/296051596897550337/721355680488882226/image.png[/img] [/quote] Thank you for the report. These should now be corrected, though it may take up to a day for the site's internal cache to catch up. --------------------- [quote name="quotesnmiracles" date="2020-06-13 11:23:17" ] Is f guardian back wing supposed to look plain? I have a feeling that lineart and/or shadows are missing [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=17&breed=2&element=5&eyetype=1&gender=1&tert=89&tertgene=14&winggene=17&wings=89&auth=9981184af466e1fb8faae88e3e0739616005f834&dummyext=prev.png[/img] Edit: m guardian with same genes/colors, back wing looks fine [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=17&breed=2&element=5&eyetype=1&gender=0&tert=89&tertgene=14&winggene=17&wings=89&auth=37f93dab68b7c49aa91fe6daa938629615743ed2&dummyext=prev.png[/img] [/quote] The guardian female has her back wing in complete shadow on our templates across the site; however, because the guardian male got some additional shadows added in there for alloy, I think it's warranted to add a few for her just for this gene, since this gene naturally adds a bit of extra shadow. The changes are in, but may take up to a day to appear as our site's internal cache catches up. Thank you for the report. This should now be corrected, though it may take up to a day for the site's internal cache to use the new art. ------------------- [quote name="TheFloralFaun" date="2020-06-13 14:06:43" ] [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=167&bodygene=35&breed=17&element=1&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=2&tertgene=34&winggene=0&wings=2&auth=f9fc4710226589ab98208557cc6cfa16f2813948&dummyext=prev.png[/img] [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=130&bodygene=35&breed=17&element=1&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=2&tertgene=34&winggene=0&wings=2&auth=96cc4dff2e0f8b6be96c5b7c9bfafd90d1049ae1&dummyext=prev.png[/img] [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=56&bodygene=35&breed=17&element=1&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=2&tertgene=34&winggene=0&wings=2&auth=37422d7eb5c672a959c2192c99f097ac84bfe58a&dummyext=prev.png[/img] In all colors (as far as I can tell) of the Male Gaoler Tapir gene the front left foot has shading on the toes that none of the other viewable feet show. As Im not sure which is the correct version of the foot Ill let the team decide which is the bug (though I think its the one with shading but idk). Just figured I would point it out! [/quote] Thank you for the report. This should now be corrected! --------------------------- [quote name="IcyUmbreon827" date="2020-06-13 17:05:38" ] Uhh idk if I post this here.. but circuit cuts over male skydancer's leg fluff. [img]https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/701970388527349824/721515112665448509/Untitled78_20200613190245.png[/img] [img]https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/701970388527349824/721515112946598029/Untitled78_20200613190305.png[/img] [/quote] THank you for the report. The fix for this is in, but it may take up to a day for the site's cache to start using the new art.

Undel

Developer

357

102

798

5845

June 14, 2020 20:37:46

As a heads up, I may not respond to duplicate error reports! I appreciate you all taking the time to report things!

Solarae wrote on 2020-06-13 03:17:10:

Adult male tundras with Sapphire Butterfly have jet black mane and tail fur that cover everything

dragon?age=1&body=112&bodygene=17&breed=6&element=8&eyetype=10&gender=0&tert=46&tertgene=23&winggene=13&wings=71&auth=abd925ff30310e930725849c6d512a659f9650bb&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=112&bodygene=17&breed=6&element=8&eyetype=10&gender=0&tert=46&tertgene=23&winggene=13&wings=71&auth=abd925ff30310e930725849c6d512a659f9650bb&dummyext=prev.png

Edit: Skydancers also have the black fur
dragon?age=1&body=111&bodygene=17&breed=13&element=7&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=22&tertgene=8&winggene=13&wings=71&auth=6d59fbdc3b7d3313b16779af39c0120b7f3becff&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=111&bodygene=17&breed=13&element=7&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=22&tertgene=8&winggene=13&wings=71&auth=6d59fbdc3b7d3313b16779af39c0120b7f3becff&dummyext=prev.png

But imperial and Pearlcatcher is fine
dragon?age=1&body=111&bodygene=17&breed=8&element=7&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=22&tertgene=8&winggene=13&wings=71&auth=b8ced5ffc6bf0429459a4a345a562c61d5e18d4f&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=111&bodygene=17&breed=8&element=7&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=22&tertgene=8&winggene=13&wings=71&auth=b8ced5ffc6bf0429459a4a345a562c61d5e18d4f&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=111&bodygene=17&breed=4&element=7&eyetype=3&gender=0&tert=22&tertgene=8&winggene=13&wings=71&auth=8e763f6d63f0287bc551b915502c0b16a48a5078&dummyext=prev.png

Thank you for the report. These should now be corrected. Note that this does affect all colors, as it ensures that the tundra and skydancers have a standard mane color rather than the darkest outline of the butterfly gene, which was inconsistently used in the mane area.

Midorikage wrote on 2020-06-13 02:44:02:

First: I'm glad some of the older bleeding issues and other more recent art errors were fixed!
However they seem to have been picked from the last few pages of this thread, so I'm gonna post here a list of all the gene errors I've seen so far on this thread in the hope that it's useful to the devs to have them all in a single post!

Quote:

Genes that go outside the lines:
- Underbelly on F bogs
- Ghost on M ridges (front leg)
- Smirch on F nocs (wings, head)
- Cherub on M nocs (neck)
- All secondaries on M coatls bleed onto the tail (butt wings)
- Piebald on baby imps has stray pixels
- Weathered bleeding on the wing pawpad of F gaolers
- Bar and tiger in M wildclaws bleed onto the belly on the tail
- Phantom on F gaolers clips onto the wing claw (dark of the tail)

Missing portions/colors:
- Ultramarine seraph on all breeds
- Okapi on baby guardians's back leg
- Lionfish on baby imps (back leg missing stripes)
- Nails on several breeds with jaguar
- Nails on several breeds with lionfish
- The uncolored bit on mist seraph of M ridges
- Vermillion shimmer on F coatls has the wrong gradient
- Current on M ridges (back wing)
- Wrong colors in skydancers gems/antennaes with lionfish
- Python on F PCs (missing accent color)
- The eye-ridge of F tundras
- Uncolored squares on F bogs W/lace (base of the wing)
- Noxtide on F skydancers fluff (white patches)
- Front feet on M spirals with laced
- Capsule missing on baby tundra's belly
- Unusual lightning eyes on baby mirrors show as water unusual
- Tapir on M gaolers has an extra gradient on the left front foot
- Toxin spearmint has wrong accent colors on BScales
- Noxtide is missing the pattern on M coatls buttwing

Missing/misplaced shading/trasparency:
- Iri/shim on the new colors
- Noxtide on M nocs's frills
- Noxtide on M PCs doesn't have shadow trasparency
- Ringlets on all breeds, except F banescale
- The missing plate on iridescent M ridges
- Met/Alloy's highlights on fem nocs
- Laced on baby skydancers bolder shading
- Filigree on baby PCs is missing some lines on the side
- Filigree on M snappers is missing some lines on the chin
- Ice glimmer on F ridgebacks has the wrong shading color
- The highlight for capsule on M faes follows the old lineart

Other:
- Spines not following the spine of the dragon on some breeds
- Seraph on M PCs (weird white line)
- Capsule on M snappers (shoulder)
- Capsule on M spirals

Thank you for your organizational efforts. I'll be going through the thread myself, as being able to see the images directly can point me to what's wrong and whether or not it's an error or supposed to be like that. But I'll be sure to take a gander at this list a second time after I think I'm a bit closer to "wrapping things up" and see if there's something that I completely missed!

Nabesima wrote on 2020-06-13 05:10:49:

Since the issues began gaining attention, I want to repeat a thing that'd been bothering me for years, that being the old issue with new IriShim lighting layer. It's been noted as something to be fixed back when the color wheel received its update.

It's especially noticeable on Pearlcatchers for some reason, not as bad on most other breeds.
Azure:
dragon?age=1&body=27&bodygene=1&breed=4&element=1&eyetype=1&gender=0&tert=19&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=27&auth=b6ce6cf7ed27e99fefaac7bd28ef312e83b74f68&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=27&bodygene=1&breed=4&element=1&eyetype=1&gender=0&tert=19&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=27&auth=b6ce6cf7ed27e99fefaac7bd28ef312e83b74f68&dummyext=prev.png

Abyss:

dragon?age=1&body=96&bodygene=1&breed=4&element=1&eyetype=1&gender=0&tert=19&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=96&auth=58aa767df4391ba7c9bb2be777eb3491ecaec734&dummyext=prev.png

Magenta:

dragon?age=1&body=65&bodygene=1&breed=4&element=1&eyetype=1&gender=1&tert=19&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=65&auth=093f5a064ec396891bae4dc6db4e68a47f7990f7&dummyext=prev.png

Fuchsia:

dragon?age=1&body=170&bodygene=1&breed=4&element=1&eyetype=1&gender=1&tert=19&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=170&auth=d16dd4cdcd8d2d120964789a5cfca8f019601a44&dummyext=prev.png

The lighting layer seem to be significantly less transparent on the new colors. Notably it's not as bad on other breeds. Fuchsia on F Imperials:
dragon?age=1&body=170&bodygene=1&breed=8&element=1&eyetype=1&gender=1&tert=19&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=170&auth=cabe15d91251e039d5b7dbcf8e006c13c2ffa71a&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=170&bodygene=1&breed=8&element=1&eyetype=1&gender=1&tert=19&tertgene=0&winggene=1&wings=170&auth=cabe15d91251e039d5b7dbcf8e006c13c2ffa71a&dummyext=prev.png

Thank you for the report. We are not going to be making a decision on iridescent and shimmer until all the other genes are addressed. They're a big commitment to change, and have been on the site for quite a while. Each one (as I keep repeating like an annoying broken record - sorry about that!) is colored by hand and not by a generator, so inconsistencies will be present. The first 67 colors released on site were colored at a different time than the color wheel expansion, which may explain some of the differences.

The first 67 colors generally have non-colored line art, wildly different hue shifts from dragon to dragon for the same color, and their highlights are a bit mushy. Many of the color expansion colors are more consistent from dragon to dragon for the same color, but have highlights that are too harsh, and some are pure white, which is not how iridescent should probably look.

Note that we are working on an iridescent update for fae on colors 1-67 (the original pre-expansion colors), as they had black line art and pelvic bumps that are not consistent with the rest of fae art on site. So they have a true error, whereas the rest we are currently tagging as inconsistencies that we'll need to think about before basically redoing the entire gene. Apologies for the long-winded explanation! Thankfully we do not hand color genes anymore aside from this one, so errors can be more clearly recognized as such and things should (hopefully) be pretty standard!

dragonNMR wrote on 2020-06-13 06:32:20:

It’s been years since the genes petals and butterfly came out but there is still an error with butterfly on male imps with the lines going over the tail. Will this ever be addressed?

Thank you for the report. These should now be corrected, though it may take up to a day for the site's internal cache to catch up.

quotesnmiracles wrote on 2020-06-13 11:23:17:

Is f guardian back wing supposed to look plain? I have a feeling that lineart and/or shadows are missing

dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=17&breed=2&element=5&eyetype=1&gender=1&tert=89&tertgene=14&winggene=17&wings=89&auth=9981184af466e1fb8faae88e3e0739616005f834&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=17&breed=2&element=5&eyetype=1&gender=1&tert=89&tertgene=14&winggene=17&wings=89&auth=9981184af466e1fb8faae88e3e0739616005f834&dummyext=prev.png

Edit: m guardian with same genes/colors, back wing looks fine
dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=17&breed=2&element=5&eyetype=1&gender=0&tert=89&tertgene=14&winggene=17&wings=89&auth=37f93dab68b7c49aa91fe6daa938629615743ed2&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=17&breed=2&element=5&eyetype=1&gender=0&tert=89&tertgene=14&winggene=17&wings=89&auth=37f93dab68b7c49aa91fe6daa938629615743ed2&dummyext=prev.png

The guardian female has her back wing in complete shadow on our templates across the site; however, because the guardian male got some additional shadows added in there for alloy, I think it's warranted to add a few for her just for this gene, since this gene naturally adds a bit of extra shadow. The changes are in, but may take up to a day to appear as our site's internal cache catches up.

Thank you for the report. This should now be corrected, though it may take up to a day for the site's internal cache to use the new art.

TheFloralFaun wrote on 2020-06-13 14:06:43:

dragon?age=1&body=167&bodygene=35&breed=17&element=1&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=2&tertgene=34&winggene=0&wings=2&auth=f9fc4710226589ab98208557cc6cfa16f2813948&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=130&bodygene=35&breed=17&element=1&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=2&tertgene=34&winggene=0&wings=2&auth=96cc4dff2e0f8b6be96c5b7c9bfafd90d1049ae1&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=1&body=56&bodygene=35&breed=17&element=1&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=2&tertgene=34&winggene=0&wings=2&auth=37422d7eb5c672a959c2192c99f097ac84bfe58a&dummyext=prev.png

In all colors (as far as I can tell) of the Male Gaoler Tapir gene the front left foot has shading on the toes that none of the other viewable feet show.

As Im not sure which is the correct version of the foot Ill let the team decide which is the bug (though I think its the one with shading but idk).

Just figured I would point it out!

Thank you for the report. This should now be corrected!

IcyUmbreon827 wrote on 2020-06-13 17:05:38:

Uhh idk if I post this here.. but circuit cuts over male skydancer's leg fluff.

THank you for the report. The fix for this is in, but it may take up to a day for the site's cache to start using the new art.

Last edited on Jun 14, 2020 20:42:37 by Undel

[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=0&breed=7&element=4&eyetype=2&gender=0&tert=78&tertgene=19&winggene=0&wings=10&auth=49cf314c70b6e3e27954a0ba187f9bc6d518c1e4&dummyext=prev.png[/img] [img]https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/519128157979148302/721934923723833344/unknown.png[/img] smirch on male spirals clips out of one of the wings, the one that goes over their tail. hope it's not too much trouble to point it out! thank you for all the work you've done so far! [emoji=heart size=1]

Garlond

581

315

640

4482

June 14, 2020 20:53:45

dragon?age=1&body=10&bodygene=0&breed=7&element=4&eyetype=2&gender=0&tert=78&tertgene=19&winggene=0&wings=10&auth=49cf314c70b6e3e27954a0ba187f9bc6d518c1e4&dummyext=prev.png

smirch on male spirals clips out of one of the wings, the one that goes over their tail. hope it's not too much trouble to point it out!

thank you for all the work you've done so far!

not sure if this has already been mentioned, (and sorry if it has!) but it hasn't been fixed yet so the back leg on baby guardians with okapi? [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=0&body=92&bodygene=19&breed=2&element=8&eyetype=10&gender=1&tert=49&tertgene=9&winggene=16&wings=6&auth=a7a7c73dc479017372fd0b8b90664fbf396fc97b&dummyext=prev.png[/img] ^ the left hind leg is supposed to have the okapi pattern/color, but doesnt! here's how a skydancer looks for reference [img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=0&body=92&bodygene=19&breed=13&element=8&eyetype=10&gender=1&tert=49&tertgene=9&winggene=16&wings=6&auth=28d2e48c05e804fb77b970097e4bbfdb4e5c4801&dummyext=prev.png[/img]

ufology

666

533

1163

6525

June 14, 2020 21:16:23

not sure if this has already been mentioned, (and sorry if it has!) but it hasn't been fixed yet so the back leg on baby guardians with okapi?
dragon?age=0&body=92&bodygene=19&breed=2&element=8&eyetype=10&gender=1&tert=49&tertgene=9&winggene=16&wings=6&auth=a7a7c73dc479017372fd0b8b90664fbf396fc97b&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=0&body=92&bodygene=19&breed=2&element=8&eyetype=10&gender=1&tert=49&tertgene=9&winggene=16&wings=6&auth=a7a7c73dc479017372fd0b8b90664fbf396fc97b&dummyext=prev.png

^ the left hind leg is supposed to have the okapi pattern/color, but doesnt!

here's how a skydancer looks for reference
dragon?age=0&body=92&bodygene=19&breed=13&element=8&eyetype=10&gender=1&tert=49&tertgene=9&winggene=16&wings=6&auth=28d2e48c05e804fb77b970097e4bbfdb4e5c4801&dummyext=prev.png

dragon?age=0&body=92&bodygene=19&breed=13&element=8&eyetype=10&gender=1&tert=49&tertgene=9&winggene=16&wings=6&auth=28d2e48c05e804fb77b970097e4bbfdb4e5c4801&dummyext=prev.png

• ufology
they/he/she

Last edited on Jun 14, 2020 21:21:31 by ufology

Thank you for all of these fixes! It’s wonderful to see old gene errors get patched up! c: I’m a little sad to see the dark mane on SDs and Tundras with Butterfly go (I thought it was intentional), but everything else is great.

A (hopefully) quick question:

Is it possible to just tweak the highlight layers on new-colour Iridescent/Shimmer in the automated system? The colours themselves don’t need any fixing, but the highlight layer seems to be set at 100% opacity, which destroys the lineart in places. I’m not sure how the automated gene colouring system works, so I don’t know if a shading/highlight opacity change would have to be done by hand or not (I definitely understand not wanting to go back and manually edit hundreds of pieces of art, haha).

Ningyo

705

269

356

10087

June 14, 2020 21:19:47

Thank you for all of these fixes! It’s wonderful to see old gene errors get patched up! c: I’m a little sad to see the dark mane on SDs and Tundras with Butterfly go (I thought it was intentional), but everything else is great.

A (hopefully) quick question:

Is it possible to just tweak the highlight layers on new-colour Iridescent/Shimmer in the automated system? The colours themselves don’t need any fixing, but the highlight layer seems to be set at 100% opacity, which destroys the lineart in places. I’m not sure how the automated gene colouring system works, so I don’t know if a shading/highlight opacity change would have to be done by hand or not (I definitely understand not wanting to go back and manually edit hundreds of pieces of art, haha).

Ashes | F

+4h FR time

Feel free to ping me!