[img]http://imgur.com/lwBZuYk.png[/img]
99.9% sure I did the table wrong too, it's late-ish and I can't function right now.
I have an epidemiology class at my high school and I can't figure out how to add in a before and after thing. How the heck do you graph this? Did I do the table wrong too?
99.9% sure I did the table wrong too, it's late-ish and I can't function right now.
I have an epidemiology class at my high school and I can't figure out how to add in a before and after thing. How the heck do you graph this? Did I do the table wrong too?
@
Amorah
Your data is most likely wrong. 197 is a huge number when the rest are less than ten, and most being 0... that's going to make your graph very skewed and bias-looking. Maybe double check that your information is correct
@
Amorah
Your data is most likely wrong. 197 is a huge number when the rest are less than ten, and most being 0... that's going to make your graph very skewed and bias-looking. Maybe double check that your information is correct
@
KingofCrows
Well, I definitely think our data is inaccurate. We were testing how much bacteria is on the toilet flushers, before and after the cleaning. We did the first and second stall, the first stall had less bacteria since people probably use that one the least. And there was more bacteria on the second toilet stall since people may use it more.
We probably should have tested the first stall on one floor, and tested another first stall on another floor.
I don't know, we're supposed to be testing how effective is cleaner #1 and Cleaner #2. But it really looks like we're testing to see which stall is the dirtiest. Or both.
Anyways, thanks for the help.
Excuse my terrible writing (": I'm should be sleeping right now but Im still on my phone RIP
@
KingofCrows
Well, I definitely think our data is inaccurate. We were testing how much bacteria is on the toilet flushers, before and after the cleaning. We did the first and second stall, the first stall had less bacteria since people probably use that one the least. And there was more bacteria on the second toilet stall since people may use it more.
We probably should have tested the first stall on one floor, and tested another first stall on another floor.
I don't know, we're supposed to be testing how effective is cleaner #1 and Cleaner #2. But it really looks like we're testing to see which stall is the dirtiest. Or both.
Anyways, thanks for the help.
Excuse my terrible writing (": I'm should be sleeping right now but Im still on my phone RIP
