Warchild wrote on 2019-12-19 22:32:07:
Kids probably are more likely to naively break all kinds of rules, but in the instances I've seen locked accounts getting their names changed the usernames were as innocent as "LightningPizza". (Not the actual name, of course.)
Maybe usernames get changed when the staff is 100% sure that they won't unlock the account again. If I remember right setting up an account while under the age of 13 is one of the reasons why an account gets permanently locked. Even if they tried to explain they were only joking about being only 12 (or any age that would indicate the account was created when they were below 13) the account will remain to be locked forever.
Edit: Typo, added clarification.
Also I tried to find an exact quote to confirm what I believe to have read, but I sadly can't find it. Still it's probably better to just never lie on here about age, not even as a joke.
Yeah, I figured it was not that all kids did it, but enough that it was better to simply change the names rather than try to cherry pick which were information that could be used and which couldn't.
I also agree it is much better to nor lie about your age being younger than 13, on any site, since sites can get into trouble for allowing children on sites unless they have certain things in place. Thus sites are more likely to punish users who say they are under 13, since if they don't, they can open themselves up to punishment themselves.
As for accounts with no activity, that would negate the entire 'name squatting' Nightwind and I were talking about, where people will take usernames on certain sites to make sure someone else can't take it and use it to 'tarnish' their name. This would be especially important for people who have businesses related to said site theme (again, such as an artist who draws dragons taking their business name to make sure others can't take it and use it to scam others in their name).
Again, until this truly becomes a problem (and since there are less than half a million accounts and according to a google answer:
Quote:
more than a million total words, about 170,000 words in current use
, just in the ENGLISH language, let alone the non-english names/words that can be used as well as alternate spellings and creative ways to spell words, I don't think it will be a problem for a while), I don't think there is any need to remove names from players who may come back, even accounts with no activity, while not likely to have the creator come back, could.
@
Renaiwom
About the IDs, nothing would change, as that would create a HUGE problem, since I am sure that everything about an account is identified on the back end by ID, not UN. All that would happen is the ID would stay the same for that account, but the name would be changed to 'NamechangeXXXXXX' or some other generic name.