ImpossibleJedi4 wrote on 2020-06-10 10:46:42:
Uhhh I'm sure grapefruit phantom isn't supposed to be like... this???
Thanks for the report. This is not an error.
wintergreenroses wrote on 2020-06-09 19:05:15:
adult female gaolers have a patch of fur that's a different color with berry striation. cerise striation doesn't have this problem
error:
absence of error:
it's on the neck right below the ear
edit: i am a fool, it's berry tapir that's the problem
Thank you for the report. Females have that tuft of fur designated as body color across all genes, and it is not considered an error.
Fellefan wrote on 2020-06-02 20:55:32:
this may not fit in here, but I don't know where else to post it.
I'm pretty sure the wingclaws on baby gaolers with thylacine are supposed to be bare, but it seems the artist forgot to erase the leftover color.
some different colors so you can spot it more easily
THank you for the report. Those nails should not have color over them. Corrections have been uploaded, but it may take up to a day for the generator's cache to start using the updated files (it may happen immediately for some colors. The site's internal cache is a mystery to me....)
Anduins wrote on 2020-05-23 05:14:46:
For Glowtail on Male Guardians, it's missing its lighter colored tip. It instead fades out like it does near the base of the tail. Pretty noticeable with Lionfish Primary!
Male scry with mistake:
Same scry but on Female Guard, where it doesnt have this mistake:
Thank you for the report. This should be corrected and the males should have nice opaque tails uploaded. However, the site's internal cache may take up to a day to reflect the change.
Eversnow wrote on 2020-05-11 19:22:41:
I was playing around with glowtail for my random Gen and the shadow layer appears to no longer be multiplying if you have a noxtide secondary, on female skydancers ;; not sure if it's an art error or intentional, but I have a feeling it might be the former
Thanks for bringing this up. The shadow layer should hopefully be behaving again, though it may take up to a day for the site's internal cache to register that there's new images!
ThistleProse wrote on 2020-05-11 23:05:51:
Cyan Alloy is showing inccorect highlight colour on Fae Females. Its showing up as green instead of a pale blue like on all the other bases.
I absolutely love the way it looks, alas
If you like it, the good news is that looking over the file, this was an artist choice and is correct. the green is a color that highlights the shadows, and the fae female's lower wing can be interpreted as being in shadow based on where the standard shadow layer is. It does have some pretty wild results, though I think I'm a fan too!
kazay wrote on 2020-05-14 09:33:57:
Female Tundra's lower horn (below the ear) doesn't change colors with the Runes tertiary gene as it should (and does with other genes).
Example:
Thank you for the report. This should now be corrected, though it may take up to a day for the site's mysterious internal cache to catch up!
seekae wrote on 2020-04-29 10:29:41:
contour on baby wildclaws goes over the edge of the lineart :3 that's all
Thank you for the report. The fix has been uploaded, though it may take up to a day for changes to appear!
PixelSpiral wrote on 2020-04-27 07:16:23:
on male spirals with tiger specifically. the thumb claw on the left hind leg is miscolored
Thank you for the report. This should now be corrected, though changes may take up to a day to show up!
IsleOfBerk wrote on 2020-04-30 17:47:26:
It's a relatively small thing, but now that I've seen it, I can't unseen it and it bothers me. The line art for the Fae breed must have been changed at some point because the Iridescent lines for (I assume all of) the older colors doesn't match with the newer colors, or the belly tert genes. Specifically, there is a slight bump in the pubic area. It's more prominent on the female art than the male art.
Females in Sky and Cornflower Pri:
Males in Sky and Cornflower Pri:
(It also looks like the shadows/highlights in general could use a little love for the old colors. But that doesn't bug me nearly as much.)
Thank you for the report. This fix is pending, but we should be able to get the pelvic bones out of there on the original 67 colors. It's not going up immediately because an artist has to recolor it by hand and try and match it to the original. We can't use the site's recolor engine to do it for us. Iridescent is a fun gene like that.
potatho wrote on 2020-05-05 08:12:41:
lapis runes doesn't turn yellow on male skydancers? idk if this is a mistake or just meant to be like this, but it turns yellow on everybody else so
|
lapis
|
It appears that a color layer was missing! It was missing a second glow on all of the runes on male skydancers. THank you for the report. THis has been corrected, but it may take up to a day for the site's internal cache to catch up.
ViciousCurse wrote on 2020-03-14 16:22:31:
(Dunno if this has been mentioned or not, but posting anyways.)
Lace on baby banescales look weird. Unfortunately the example I noticed this on has a lighter tert.
Lace seems to be clipping out of the lineart on both wings, but I didn't notice it on his tail or neck. This issue doesn't seem to be apparent on adult banescales either.
Here's the example:
Here's the same baby on a dark BG:
EDIT: Added more information.
Thank you for the report. The fix for this is in, but it may take up to a day for the site's internal cache to catch up.
Kapow wrote on 2020-04-23 11:58:40:
There may actually be a few more mismatched pearlcatcher m jaguar bellies looks like. Turns out it was missing a jaguar belly layer, so the recolor engine defaulted to the basic belly. Whoops! The fix for this should be in, but it may take up to a day for the site's cache to catch up. Thanks for the report.
.....
.....
Blue // they/he 
