There's some coloring outside the lines on all of the poses for Faes, Guardians, Imperials, Nocturnes, Obelisks, Snappers, Spirals, Tundras, Wildclaws, and Pearlcatchers. It's most noticeable on the hatchlings of each breed.
For the imps, it's hard to see on the Female Imperial, but there's a few pixels here and there outside of the lines.
Some examples:
[img]https://i.imgur.com/AcMlXhz.png[/img]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/bqlXcA5.png[/img]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/0IrE9yG.png[/img]
It's the same with Male Mirrors as well, although it's harder to notice. The Mirror hatchlings have a few pixels by their wings.
[img]https://i.imgur.com/z2ktSZs.png[/img]
Male and Hatchling Ridgebacks have pixels outside the lines, but the Female pose looks like it's fine.
The only ones that don't seem to have this issue are Bogsneaks, Skydancers, and Coatls.
There's some coloring outside the lines on all of the poses for Faes, Guardians, Imperials, Nocturnes, Obelisks, Snappers, Spirals, Tundras, Wildclaws, and Pearlcatchers. It's most noticeable on the hatchlings of each breed.
For the imps, it's hard to see on the Female Imperial, but there's a few pixels here and there outside of the lines.
Some examples:
It's the same with Male Mirrors as well, although it's harder to notice. The Mirror hatchlings have a few pixels by their wings.
Male and Hatchling Ridgebacks have pixels outside the lines, but the Female pose looks like it's fine.
The only ones that don't seem to have this issue are Bogsneaks, Skydancers, and Coatls.
I think these genes are wonderful honestly but I do have a question. I understand that dark black was intentional for these genes but is anything going to be done about the fact that many are so dark that you can't see line art or shadows? I'm only curious because the dragons can be hard to distinguish and while the gene may be intended to be dark, I don't think it should be so dark you can't really see the dragon. I'm not sure that was your intention when creating the genes or the desired look.
I think these genes are wonderful honestly but I do have a question. I understand that dark black was intentional for these genes but is anything going to be done about the fact that many are so dark that you can't see line art or shadows? I'm only curious because the dragons can be hard to distinguish and while the gene may be intended to be dark, I don't think it should be so dark you can't really see the dragon. I'm not sure that was your intention when creating the genes or the desired look.
I noticed that Sarcophagus on Obelisks (M and F), the mane and leg fur fade from the colour of the secondary to black, meanwhile the the tail is straight black. Is that intentional?
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=60&bodygene=0&breed=15&element=6&eyetype=2&gender=0&tert=175&tertgene=0&winggene=87&wings=17&auth=7504d94466d84a0fd5736e70bab4eca4649262ce&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
Other secondary genes carry the patterns on the mane to the tail, so it's a little jarring to not see the same effect here. It might be intentional, but it sure don't look it.
I noticed that Sarcophagus on Obelisks (M and F), the mane and leg fur fade from the colour of the secondary to black, meanwhile the the tail is straight black. Is that intentional?
Other secondary genes carry the patterns on the mane to the tail, so it's a little jarring to not see the same effect here. It might be intentional, but it sure don't look it.
Unsure if this is a error, but there are several breeds that don't have claws colored while others do.
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=45&bodygene=87&breed=8&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=45&tertgene=8&winggene=87&wings=45&auth=4831356689fde441e8b6554f9045836409b7a0cc&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=45&bodygene=87&breed=8&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=1&tert=45&tertgene=8&winggene=87&wings=45&auth=415dae2d425b9616febb59c0c69cfb5b576d807f&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
vs
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=45&bodygene=87&breed=5&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=1&tert=45&tertgene=8&winggene=87&wings=45&auth=e8ff3ff8165d5879d8638c1f0a4656839b58abee&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=45&bodygene=87&breed=5&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=45&tertgene=8&winggene=87&wings=45&auth=c4dde2316359e5764cfdda54fa9338962f08932a&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
It looks like Bogsneak, Coatl, Fae, Guardians, Imperials, Mirrors, Obelisk, Pearlcatcher, and Tundra do not have the claw colors.
While Nocturne, Ridgeback, Wildclaw(though only on one claw), Skydancer, Snapper, and Spirals do.
Unsure if this is a error, but there are several breeds that don't have claws colored while others do.
vs
It looks like Bogsneak, Coatl, Fae, Guardians, Imperials, Mirrors, Obelisk, Pearlcatcher, and Tundra do not have the claw colors.
While Nocturne, Ridgeback, Wildclaw(though only on one claw), Skydancer, Snapper, and Spirals do.
All breeds/sexes have the same patterning on the belly, so I'm assuming it's intentional, but it still looks strange, so I figured I'd check.
It goes from striped to solid, and the back to striped.
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=46&bodygene=87&breed=9&element=9&eyetype=0&gender=1&tert=30&tertgene=0&winggene=0&wings=2&auth=23da0ef451a472782ae9935d7ac952aaf6caf902&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=44&bodygene=87&breed=14&element=9&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=30&tertgene=0&winggene=0&wings=2&auth=b4059af9fe926119893c9def49303dfed6480e39&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=128&bodygene=87&breed=12&element=9&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=30&tertgene=0&winggene=0&wings=2&auth=a313c164a8ea5a2bc48c6d3047b551bf0d23293f&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
Please do not make the blacks any lighter, I for one am definitely looking forward to canon black colors that UMA makers are now allowed to use that aren't "too dark" to put on dragons.
Please do not make the blacks any lighter, I for one am definitely looking forward to canon black colors that UMA makers are now allowed to use that aren't "too dark" to put on dragons.
[quote name="DigitalMirage" date="2022-01-18 14:52:21" ]
@undel even the coatl part? or is that a "different art error" sort of thing
[/quote]
Even the coatl feathers are correct. They merge into the pharaoh body pattern. Quite a few other genes do this, though I'll grant that if you put it on top of a contrasting basic it can be a bit of a stark delineation!
DigitalMirage wrote on 2022-01-18 14:52:21:
@
undel even the coatl part? or is that a "different art error" sort of thing
Even the coatl feathers are correct. They merge into the pharaoh body pattern. Quite a few other genes do this, though I'll grant that if you put it on top of a contrasting basic it can be a bit of a stark delineation!
[quote name="Reilata" date="2022-01-18 18:34:33" ]
Unsure if this is a error, but there are several breeds that don't have claws colored while others do.
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=45&bodygene=87&breed=8&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=45&tertgene=8&winggene=87&wings=45&auth=4831356689fde441e8b6554f9045836409b7a0cc&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=45&bodygene=87&breed=8&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=1&tert=45&tertgene=8&winggene=87&wings=45&auth=415dae2d425b9616febb59c0c69cfb5b576d807f&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
vs
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=45&bodygene=87&breed=5&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=1&tert=45&tertgene=8&winggene=87&wings=45&auth=e8ff3ff8165d5879d8638c1f0a4656839b58abee&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
[img]https://www1.flightrising.com/dgen/preview/dragon?age=1&body=45&bodygene=87&breed=5&element=8&eyetype=0&gender=0&tert=45&tertgene=8&winggene=87&wings=45&auth=c4dde2316359e5764cfdda54fa9338962f08932a&dummyext=prev.png[/img]
It looks like Bogsneak, Coatl, Fae, Guardians, Imperials, Mirrors, Obelisk, Pearlcatcher, and Tundra do not have the claw colors.
While Nocturne, Ridgeback, Wildclaw(though only on one claw), Skydancer, Snapper, and Spirals do.
[/quote]
This relates to whether or not they have colored claws with the basic gene. So it does vary by breed.
Reilata wrote on 2022-01-18 18:34:33:
Unsure if this is a error, but there are several breeds that don't have claws colored while others do.
vs
It looks like Bogsneak, Coatl, Fae, Guardians, Imperials, Mirrors, Obelisk, Pearlcatcher, and Tundra do not have the claw colors.
While Nocturne, Ridgeback, Wildclaw(though only on one claw), Skydancer, Snapper, and Spirals do.
This relates to whether or not they have colored claws with the basic gene. So it does vary by breed.
The pixel bleeds are an error and we'll see if we can get those cleaned up.
The pixel bleeds are an error and we'll see if we can get those cleaned up.
[quote name="vihuff" date="2022-01-18 16:27:34" ]
I think these genes are wonderful honestly but I do have a question. I understand that dark black was intentional for these genes but is anything going to be done about the fact that many are so dark that you can't see line art or shadows? I'm only curious because the dragons can be hard to distinguish and while the gene may be intended to be dark, I don't think it should be so dark you can't really see the dragon. I'm not sure that was your intention when creating the genes or the desired look.
[/quote]
I agree, I really like how it looks but when areas of the gene are almost #0000 its way too hard to discern the dragon in those areas and it looks wrong. While allegedly that was the intention, it's very jarring to be unable to see lineart or shadows on those areas.
vihuff wrote on 2022-01-18 16:27:34:
I think these genes are wonderful honestly but I do have a question. I understand that dark black was intentional for these genes but is anything going to be done about the fact that many are so dark that you can't see line art or shadows? I'm only curious because the dragons can be hard to distinguish and while the gene may be intended to be dark, I don't think it should be so dark you can't really see the dragon. I'm not sure that was your intention when creating the genes or the desired look.
I agree, I really like how it looks but when areas of the gene are almost #0000 its way too hard to discern the dragon in those areas and it looks wrong. While allegedly that was the intention, it's very jarring to be unable to see lineart or shadows on those areas.
|
|
xx
|
Ash
He/Him
|
nosy little bugger aren't you?
|
this
|
|
