Bug Report Forums

[size=6][b]If your post is referring to anything related to underbelly covering extra areas, the intensity of iridescent/shimmer highlights, obsidian crystal/facet on fae f, or gold crystal facet, these are known issues that will be corrected. You can read about them in our anniversary thread here: http://www1.flightrising.com/forums/ann/1880521[/b][/size]. I will not be addressing any reports about the above issues since they are already on schedule to be addressed. Thank you for the keen eye! [size=6]If your post is referring to shadow color or slight changes in color to the old colors, please read this snippet from our announcement posts. I will not be addressing any reports about the below issues because they are a result of standardizing our color palette for use with our image generator.[/size] [b]Intended Changes:[/b] [LIST] [*]All colors (with the exception of Iridescent & Shimmer, which are still colored by hand) have been uniformly standardized across the site. This means that some dragons will look different. The old method that our team used to recolor genes was to have an artist sample each color by hand. This was extremely time-consuming, made gene releases very infrequent, did not allow for color wheel expansion, and produced variation from dragon to dragon because of human error. Our new automated color system needs to use one color swatch for each gene area to function, allowing for no variation from breed to breed. [*]Colored shadows on old breeds/genes are now uniformly consistent to those that have been used on new breeds/genes. This brings our old breeds and our new breeds in visual alignment going forward. [/LIST] ------------------------------------------------- [quote name="ExtraSolar" date=2016-06-08 13:00:21] Auburn Hex on Male Snappers appears to be drawing the wrong colors: Looks closer to something like Dirt or Clay. [/quote] @ExtraSolar Thank you for the report. Actually it appears its the wrong color codes on all of the auburn hex/giraffes. I'll add this to be corrected. [quote name="avey" date=2016-06-08 14:34:31] Haven't seen this addressed yet so I made a thread (and then deleted it when I noticed this one: Female tundras are missing the "eyeshadow"/patch around their eyes that they used to have and that the males still have[/quote] @avey Thank you for the report. I'll add this to our corrections list. [quote name="BlueTrillium" date=2016-06-08 14:36:21] Ivory primary appears to have lost its white underbelly on all breeds and genes that I tried, which actually really bums me out as it was one of the things I loved about Ivory... Is this intentional? I thought white was always supposed to be Ivory's 'thing' just like violet or lemon's brown/tan bellies... Or am I totally hallucinating and it's always been this way? [/quote] @bluetrillium Thank you for the report. I double checked our old image generation and ivory has never had a white belly. The shadow color here has been updated though! [url=http://flightrising.com/dropbox/howodd/44.png]old[/url] | [url=http://flightrising.com/dropbox/howodd/44n.png]new[/url] [quote name="coalthedragon" date=2016-06-08 16:43:42] Not sure if anyone's brought this up yet, but there is a space between the wing and arm at the elbow (right one) of male spirals. I can see the color with underbelly, but can't if there's no underbelly. [/quote] @coalthedragon Thank you for the report. That's not a space so much as underbelly painting on top of spiral. Underbelly is misbehaving and is one of the genes we said we'd be doing corrections on in our anniversary post! :)