[quote name="Leremis" date=2017-06-15 18:05:19]
[quote name="polygone" date=2017-06-15 17:58:56]
Also, I'd rather have an inactive lynch over a no lynch. No lynch would be the worst case scenario.
[/quote]
I can't have the same motivation of avoiding a no-lynch? Don't see why I'm getting called out for the idea of lynching an inactive when you put down a vote for one. That's hypocritical.
Everyone is a possible lynch candidate regardless of activity. The wording of that shouldn't be throwing me under suspicion because that's just how it is in mafia. But alas, here we are.
[/quote]I wasn't calling you out in that post. At all. I was adding onto my thought from the previous post.
Leremis wrote on 2017-06-15:
polygone wrote on 2017-06-15:
Also, I'd rather have an inactive lynch over a no lynch. No lynch would be the worst case scenario.
I can't have the same motivation of avoiding a no-lynch? Don't see why I'm getting called out for the idea of lynching an inactive when you put down a vote for one. That's hypocritical.
Everyone is a possible lynch candidate regardless of activity. The wording of that shouldn't be throwing me under suspicion because that's just how it is in mafia. But alas, here we are.
I wasn't calling you out in that post. At all. I was adding onto my thought from the previous post.
[quote name="polygone" date=2017-06-15 18:08:35]
[quote name="Leremis" date=2017-06-15 18:05:19]
[quote name="polygone" date=2017-06-15 17:58:56]
Also, I'd rather have an inactive lynch over a no lynch. No lynch would be the worst case scenario.
[/quote]
I can't have the same motivation of avoiding a no-lynch? Don't see why I'm getting called out for the idea of lynching an inactive when you put down a vote for one. That's hypocritical.
Everyone is a possible lynch candidate regardless of activity. The wording of that shouldn't be throwing me under suspicion because that's just how it is in mafia. But alas, here we are.
[/quote]I wasn't calling you out in that post. At all. I was adding onto my thought from the previous post.
[/quote]
Was referring you when you agreed with Moonwater about me and making my reasoning seem suspicious despite your vote.
polygone wrote on 2017-06-15:
Leremis wrote on 2017-06-15:
polygone wrote on 2017-06-15:
Also, I'd rather have an inactive lynch over a no lynch. No lynch would be the worst case scenario.
I can't have the same motivation of avoiding a no-lynch? Don't see why I'm getting called out for the idea of lynching an inactive when you put down a vote for one. That's hypocritical.
Everyone is a possible lynch candidate regardless of activity. The wording of that shouldn't be throwing me under suspicion because that's just how it is in mafia. But alas, here we are.
I wasn't calling you out in that post. At all. I was adding onto my thought from the previous post.
Was referring you when you agreed with Moonwater about me and making my reasoning seem suspicious despite your vote.
@
Leremis
Your wording was odd, though. Your original wording didn't mention not having other lynch candidates, just that the inactives were who you were eyeing at that moment. Right now you sound a little bit like you're backtracking.
Yes, everyone is a possible lynch candidate regardless of activity. That you chose to apply the lynch candidate tag selectively to the inactives without mention of other people is kind of weird.
@
FM84 @
demoliceros
What is your policy on replacing inactives for this game?
@
Leremis
Your wording was odd, though. Your original wording didn't mention not having other lynch candidates, just that the inactives were who you were eyeing at that moment. Right now you sound a little bit like you're backtracking.
Yes, everyone is a possible lynch candidate regardless of activity. That you chose to apply the lynch candidate tag selectively to the inactives without mention of other people is kind of weird.
@
FM84 @
demoliceros
What is your policy on replacing inactives for this game?
@
polygone
ATM it does look like you were throwing subtle suss at Leremis and trying to brush it off now.
@
polygone
ATM it does look like you were throwing subtle suss at Leremis and trying to brush it off now.
[quote name="Leremis" date=2017-06-15 18:46:47]
Was referring you when you agreed with Moonwater about me and making my reasoning seem suspicious despite your vote.
[/quote]I agreed with Moon because they were right. It [i]is [/i]a mafia tactic to get inactives lynched. You have stated that inactives were 'potential lynch candidates', implying that you weren't interested in scumhunting or that you were already resigning yourself to an inactive lynch. I made no such claims, and my vote changes throughout the day as my suspicions change. I never told anyone to vote with me nor have I pushed for an inactive lynch. That would be you making an inactive lynch seem okay.
Leremis wrote on 2017-06-15:
Was referring you when you agreed with Moonwater about me and making my reasoning seem suspicious despite your vote.
I agreed with Moon because they were right. It
is a mafia tactic to get inactives lynched. You have stated that inactives were 'potential lynch candidates', implying that you weren't interested in scumhunting or that you were already resigning yourself to an inactive lynch. I made no such claims, and my vote changes throughout the day as my suspicions change. I never told anyone to vote with me nor have I pushed for an inactive lynch. That would be you making an inactive lynch seem okay.
[quote name="Moonwater" date=2017-06-15 18:57:33]
polygone
ATM it does look like you were throwing subtle suss at Leremis and trying to brush it off now.
[/quote]I wasn't. I wasn't even referring to the part about Ler when I was responding to your post, just the part about us not lynching inactives. If I wanted to sus Ler I would've sussed 'em. Didn't actually really notice you were sussing Ler.
Moonwater wrote on 2017-06-15:
polygone
ATM it does look like you were throwing subtle suss at Leremis and trying to brush it off now.
I wasn't. I wasn't even referring to the part about Ler when I was responding to your post, just the part about us not lynching inactives. If I wanted to sus Ler I would've sussed 'em. Didn't actually really notice you were sussing Ler.
Can't scum hunt if there's no discussion and that's why I was looking towards an inactive. No one seemed to be asking questions and no one liked mine so what else was there to do?
Can't scum hunt if there's no discussion and that's why I was looking towards an inactive. No one seemed to be asking questions and no one liked mine so what else was there to do?
Ask more questions. Poke more inactives. Talk out conflicts. As it stands I don't believe you've said anything regarding me and widmo finding each other suspicious.
Ask more questions. Poke more inactives. Talk out conflicts. As it stands I don't believe you've said anything regarding me and widmo finding each other suspicious.
@
polygone
I believe @
widmo is asleep right now, and you seem to have defended your vote against them quite well.
@
polygone
I believe @
widmo is asleep right now, and you seem to have defended your vote against them quite well.
I don't know how to feel about people right now. Too many mixed feelings.
I don't know how to feel about people right now. Too many mixed feelings.